No Agreed Definition My Azz

Why is it that this administration cannot seem to tell the truth about anything? I thought it was stupid enough that Bush wouldn't sign
plan to ensure women's rights around the globe but the excuse that they used was that there was "no agreed definition" for sexual rights. It turns out that is just a load of crap.

The World Health Organization has a very clear definition that I am sure his administration is aware of:

Sexual rights embrace human rights that are already recognized in national laws, international human rights documents and other consensus documents. These include the right of all persons, free of coercion, discrimination and violence, to:

• the highest attainable standard of health in relation to sexuality, including access to sexual and reproductive health care services;
  
• seek, receive and impart information in relation to sexuality;
  
• sexuality education;
  
• respect for bodily integrity;
  
• choice of partner;
  
• decide to be sexually active or not;
  
• consensual sexual relations;
  
• consensual marriage;
  
• decide whether or not, and when to have children;
  
• and pursue a satisfying, safe and pleasurable sexual life.
  

Exactly what part of this definition does Bushco take issue with? He certainly had no qualms about his own sexual rights when he had this exchange:

... at the 1988 Republican Convention, Hartford Courant associate editor David Fink struck up a conversation with George W. "When you're not talking politics," Fink asked the vice president's son, "what do you and [your father] talk about?"

"Pussy," George W. replied.

Liar! Loser! Hypocrite!