Tuesday, February 15, 2005

Why Can't We Call A Spade A Spade?

It is painfully obvious to everyone except Bush's red state sheeple that the primary reason for invading Iraq was the oil. I just don't understand why they need to lie about it when there is evidence, in plain sight, that verifies their true motives.

The Earlier Cheney on Our Soldiers


In August 1992, Dick Cheney, then-Secretary of Defense Dick Cheney under a very different President Bush, was asked to explain why US tanks did not roll into Baghdad and depose Saddam Hussein during the Gulf War. Cheney said:

'I don't think you could have done that without significant casualties... And the question in my mind is how many additional casualties is Saddam worth? And the answer is not that damned many... And we're not going to get bogged down in the problems of trying to take over and govern Iraq.'

'Where the Prize Ultimately Lies'

Later, then-CEO Dick Cheney of Halliburton found himself focusing on different priorities. In the fall of 1999 he complained:

'Oil companies are expected to keep developing enough oil to offset oil depletion and also to meet new demand...So where is this oil going to come from? Governments and national oil companies are obviously in control of 90 percent of the assets... The Middle East with two-thirds of the world's oil and the lowest cost is still where the prize ultimately lies.'

What had changed in the seven years between Cheney's two statements?


  • The US kept importing more and more oil to meet its energy needs.
  • Energy shortages drove home the need to ensure/increase energy supply.
  • Oil specialists concluded that 'peak oil' production was but a decade away, while demand would continue to zoom skyward.
  • The men now running US policy on the Middle East appealed to President Clinton in January 1998 to overthrow Saddam Hussein or 'a significant portion of the world's supply of oil will be put at hazard.'
  • In October 1998 Congress passed and Clinton signed a bill declaring it the sense of Congress that 'it should be the policy of the United States to support efforts to remove the regime headed by Saddam Hussein.'
  • International sanctions left a debilitated Iraq with greatly weakened armed forces headed by an 'evil dictator.'

Shortly after George W. Bush entered the White House in January 2001, Vice President Cheney's energy task force dragged out the maps of Iraq's oil fields. (We now have some of the relevant documents, courtesy of a bitterly contested Freedom of Information Act lawsuit. But the courts have upheld the White House decision to keep the task force proceedings, and even the names of its members, secret.)

To be fair, taking over Middle East oil fields was not a new idea. In 1975 Henry Kissinger, using a pseudonym, wrote an article for Harpers titled 'Seizing Arab Oil,' outlining plans to do just that, preventing Arab countries from having absolute control over the modern world's most vital commodity. But in those days there was a USSR to put the brakes on such adventurism."

It's about the oil. It has always been about the oil. It will always be about the oil.

0 Comments:

Post a Comment

<< Home