Thursday, October 26, 2006

Why Partitioning Iraq Would Be A Bad Idea

This is why. No matter what the region, too many of the cities are mixed. If the signs of ethnic cleansing are appearing now, think of what would happen if they split up Iraq.
The place was empty when U.S. soldiers burst in, raiding a house in Baghdad's violent Washash neighborhood in the hopes of finding killers involved in sectarian murders. By the look of things, no one had been there for some time, even though neighbors in the area reported seeing people dragged inside in recent weeks. But apparently someone involved in the area's sectarian violence had been there recently: left behind was a leather-bound day planner that gave a disturbing picture of the systematic nature of Baghdad's bloodshed.

Though the book was largely blank, inside were several sheets of loose paper covered in Arabic writing. Back at Camp Taji, a massive U.S. Army base north of Baghdad, translators sifted through the papers and found evidence backing up what some U.S.troops who patrol Washash have come to suspect — that Shi'ite cleric Muqtada al-Sadr's Mahdi Army are conducting what amounts to an ethnic cleansing campaign in Washash, a predominantly Shi'ite area with pockets of Sunni residents.

Sadr's militia, the document suggests, are systematically driving Sunni families from their homes around Washash, which some U.S. troops who patrol there have taken to calling Little Sadr City. Among the papers found in the raid is a list of 65 houses around Washash where Shi'ite families have replaced Sunni families. On other pages were drafts of threat letters clearly intended for delivery to Sunni homes. And there was a roster of "virtuous families" in the Washash area with house numbers written next to their names, so the militia relocation agents could keep track of people deemed fit to stay.

"They're very well organized," said Capt. Johnny Sutton, whose tro

Saddam didn't have these kinds of problems!

1 Comments:

At 9:24 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

For the past several thousand years the only thing that has kept a country stable in the middle east has been a king or dictator who ran roughshod over the people. The theocratic elements that are driving the bloodshed in Iraq today wish to go back to the days when they ruled Turkey and land to the east of Turkey, all the land Mediterranean sea clockwise from Turkey to and including Spain. They want to jump back to those days of glory with sharia as law derived from the Qur'an. Which is a leap back to the 1400s.

Before WWI "Iraq" was part of the Ottoman empire. The French and British Colonialists carved the middle east arbitrarily into "countries" and the locals are still pissed. What the "Arabs" want is the restoration of their greatness before the Ottoman empire and that would mean all of Turkey, and parts of the nations to the East or Turkey. In addition they want all of the land surrounding the eastern Mediterranean, north Africa, and Spain. Of course cleansing the space called Israel is a given. What you are seeing is part of a skirmish to be the leaders of the reformed empire that is rightfully theirs.

 

Post a Comment

<< Home