Friday, March 30, 2007

You Go Too, Joe!

Since Joe Lieberman is reading from the same comic book as John McCain , I think he needs a field trip to Iraq as well! They can stroll along the Tigris together.
Lieberman comes on the Situation Room with his violence blinders on to support his Republican pals on the Iraq war—and responds to Ware's report from yesterday. Ware responds to Holy Joe later in the show.

Lieberman: So, I — I don't — I can't directly dispute Michael Ware's overall picture, but I'll tell you most significantly, the American soldier is more confident walking the streets of Baghdad today. And that's a very important change.

Ware: So, honestly, the dynamics, the fundamental underlying schisms, what's really driving this war all over the country, are not yet being addressed. We're only talking about the surface.

He can't directly dispute anything Micahel Ware says because he isn't there in the flesh. Michael Ware is LIVING in Iraq! Living there! If Lieberman and McCain are so sure it is safe, I think it is there duty to go and prove it!

Powered by ScribeFire.

0 Comments:

Post a Comment

<< Home

Thursday, March 29, 2007

No Room At The Inn

I absolutely am going to have to laugh now. Huh?

“She wasn’t discreet about it,” said Jason Pickel, referring to a hotel employee. “She was not apologetic. She just said, ‘We do not rent to gay people.’”

For the past two and a half years, Pickel and Darren Black Bear have been in a committed relationship. During a search for a temporary home, the couple says it went to Affordable Suites of America, a long-term stay hotel located on Gion Street in Sumter.

…News19 contacted the hotel, posing as a potential renter, and inquired about two men staying in the same room. The receptionist who answered the phone told us the following: “Our policy is we don’t rent to two people of the same sex if we only have one bed.” “Is that your policy,” we asked. “That’s corporate policy because they only have one sleeping area.” We then asked, “Okay, but they can’t share the bed?” “I suppose they could, but most men don’t want to,” she said.

So, if there were two beds in the room, are they going to inspect the beds the next day to make sure both were slept in? How stupid is this? I'm not even sure I believe that it is "corporate policy" to deny two people of the same sex a hotel room - one bed, two beds, three beds. How could they possibly know who is partnered up and who is a sibling, who is a best friend or who is random roommate? This sounds like backwater, ignorant hick mess! I wish they'd stop!

Powered by ScribeFire.

0 Comments:

Post a Comment

<< Home

Yo McCain! Wanna Go For A Stroll?

Today was one of the deadliest days since the onset of the war - FOUR years ago. Yet, John McCain just boasted that you could walk around some neighborhoods in Baghdad just like the old days (of Saddam). I say he should go on a field trip without protection or an armored vehicle of any sort.


BAGHDAD - A suicide bomber killed at least 62 people and wounded 27 in a market in the Shaab district of northern Baghdad, police sources said. Most of the victims were women and children who had been out shopping in the crowded market in the Shi'ite district, a health ministry official said.

BAGHDAD - The bodies of 25 people were found in Baghdad, a police source said.

BAGHDAD - Gunmen opened fire on a crowd in Shabab district in southern Baghdad, killing one person and wounding three, a police source said.

BAGHDAD - A car bomb killed three people and wounded 16 in Jamiaa in western Baghdad, a police source said, adding that the bomb targeted an army patrol.

BAGHDAD - A senior academic at Baghdad's Mustansiriya university named Rida Qureishi was kidnapped, a police source said.

BAGHDAD - A car bomb killed four policemen and one civilian and wounded nine more police in Jihad in southwest Baghdad, the U.S. military said. Police were checking a suspicious vehicle when it exploded.

Oh, and it isn't just Baghdad. Other "safe havens" saw their share of bloodshed today too!

KHALIS - At least three suicide car bombers launched almost simultaneous attacks in a mainly Shi'ite town, killing 53 people and wounding 103, police said. The blasts took place in Khalis, 80 km (50 miles) north of Baghdad.

MOSUL - U.S. forces killed four armed men who fired on them during a raid in the northern city of Mosul, the U.S. military said. U.S. forces also detained 15 suspected insurgents in that raid and others around Iraq against al Qaeda targets.

MAHMUDIYA - A car bomb killed four people and wounded 20 in a parking lot in Mahmudiya, 30 km (20 miles) south of Baghdad, police said. A local official in the town said eight people were killed and 12 wounded.

MAHMUDIYA - Two mortar bombs landed in a residential district of Mahmudiya, killing two people and wounding seven, police said.

MOSUL - Police arrested a leader of al Qaeda in Iraq in Mosul, police said.

MOSUL - Gunmen killed Nawaf al-Hadidi, imam of a mosque in Mosul, in a drive-by shooting on Wednesday, police said.

But then, I guess I'm just being negative and "don't want to win."


Powered by ScribeFire.

Labels: ,

0 Comments:

Post a Comment

<< Home

Closing Gitmo?

So after holding people, without a trial and for who knows what, the new Secretary of Defense wants to look into how we can close it.

Congress and the Bush administration should work together to allow the U.S. to permanently imprison some of the more dangerous Guantanamo Bay detainees elsewhere so the facility can be closed, Defense Secretary Robert Gates said Thursday.

Gates said the challenge is figuring out what to do with hard-core detainees who have "made very clear they will come back and attack this country."

He said it may require a new law to "address the concerns about some of these people who really need to be incarcerated forever, but that doesn't get them involved in a judicial system where there is the potential of them being released," Gates told the House Defense Appropriations subcommittee.

Gates comments came as the Pentagon released the transcript from a Guantanamo hearing involving a Saudi linked to the Sept. 11 attacks. He said he got money transfers from two hijackers inside the United States hours before the planes struck the World Trade Center and Pentagon.

Mustafa Ahmad al-Hawsawi, who was based in the United Arab Emirates on Sept. 11, 2001, denied that he was a member of the al-Qaida terrorist network and that he sent money to the hijackers.

Lawmakers said Thursday the Guantanamo facility hurts U.S. credibility with its allies. They asked that Gates give more thought to how it could be closed and detainees moved to a military prison.

"I hope that we can work to find some way to correct this problem, because as you say, it is a stain on our reputation and we can't afford it," said Rep. David Obey, D-Wis.

Gitmo has long since been a stain on our reputation. For the most part, we need to be afraid to let any of them go - including the ones who've been detained without just cause - because there will be some "git back" for Gitmo - whether action be taken by these detainees, their sons, their son's sons or some random folks who wanna do it on GP.

Powered by ScribeFire.

0 Comments:

Post a Comment

<< Home

Husbands Can't Rape

Even though I've met a few women who are a bit light in the head who've sheepishly asked if a husband could be guilty of rape, I am sick of folks like Phyllis Schafly screaming from the mountain tops that it is not a crime. Everyone is subject to the brainwashing effects of a patriarchal society so I see how even some smart women have seeds of doubt regarding something they know isn't right. But Phyllis Schafly's decrepit ass needs to give it a rest. Just because she was forced and didn't mind doesn't mean that others cannot consider it criminal.

Believe it.

Last night at Bates College, Phyllis Schlafly gave a lecture titled, "Conservatism vs. Feminism: The Great Debate" where at one point she contended that a woman can't get raped by her husband: "By getting married, the woman has consented to sex, and I don't think you can call it rape."


I'm not married but I've been to enough weddings and would recall if the vows included anything about forced sex. Since forced sex really isn't about sex at all but rather domination, aggression, anger and power, I doubt most women in a free society would choose marriage if that is what it entailed. This isn't the Middle East afterall. Then again, perhaps that is why marriage rates are dropping and divorce rates are rising.

Powered by ScribeFire.

Labels: ,

0 Comments:

Post a Comment

<< Home

The Where On Terror

In all but an emotional, hysterical level, there is no there there

The "war on terror" has created a culture of fear in America. The Bush administration's elevation of these three words into a national mantra since the horrific events of 9/11 has had a pernicious impact on American democracy, on America's psyche and on U.S. standing in the world. Using this phrase has actually undermined our ability to effectively confront the real challenges we face from fanatics who may use terrorism against us.

The damage these three words have done -- a classic self-inflicted wound -- is infinitely greater than any wild dreams entertained by the fanatical perpetrators of the 9/11 attacks when they were plotting against us in distant Afghan caves. The phrase itself is meaningless. It defines neither a geographic context nor our presumed enemies. Terrorism is not an enemy but a technique of warfare -- political intimidation through the killing of unarmed non-combatants.

But the little secret here may be that the vagueness of the phrase was deliberately (or instinctively) calculated by its sponsors. Constant reference to a "war on terror" did accomplish one major objective: It stimulated the emergence of a culture of fear. Fear obscures reason, intensifies emotions and makes it easier for demagogic politicians to mobilize the public on behalf of the policies they want to pursue. The war of choice in Iraq could never have gained the congressional support it got without the psychological linkage between the shock of 9/11 and the postulated existence of Iraqi weapons of mass destruction. Support for President Bush in the 2004 elections was also mobilized in part by the notion that "a nation at war" does not change its commander in chief in midstream. The sense of a pervasive but otherwise imprecise danger was thus channeled in a politically expedient direction by the mobilizing appeal of being "at war ..."

0 Comments:

Post a Comment

<< Home

Can We Say Bu-Bye Now?



Gonzales is a liar!

Today, under questioning from Sen. Chuck Schumer (D-NY), Sampson said, under oath, that he “shared information with anyone who wanted it.” Specifically, Sampson said he did share information with McNulty and Moschella prior to their testimonies before Congress. Schumer responded: “So the Attorney General’s statement is wrong, is false. How could it not be?” Sampson froze. Ultimately, he acknowledged Gonzales’s statement is “not accurate.” Watch it:


Update: Okay, I'm surprised. Sampson is throwing him under the bus for real!

Powered by ScribeFire.

Labels: , , ,

0 Comments:

Post a Comment

<< Home

In The Words of Paul Mooney ...

... before he decided not to use the word anymore: "Er'body wanna be a n*gga but don't nobody wanna be a n*gga!"
At the annual Radio/Television Correspondents' Association Dinner&nbsp;last night, comedians Colin Mochrie and Brad Sherwood of Whose Line Is It Anyway? brought Karl Rove up on stage for a tribute rap song. Not as good as Colbert's roast of President Bush last year, but it's pretty damn funny to see Karl try to get down with his bad self.

Why do white folks (especially conservatives) get such a kick out of imitating the very thing they will be bashing the black community about in the next breath? I am unimpressed with MC Rove.

Powered by ScribeFire.

Labels: ,

1 Comments:

At 12:37 PM, Anonymous Stephen Foster said...

Agree completely. Rove is a pig. I'm almost suprised that he didn't black up. By the way, doesn't Karl look like Elmer Fudd? I kept expecting him to sing, "Kill the wabbit."

 

Post a Comment

<< Home

And He's Bush's Friend ...

Well, isn't this interesting ...The King (means there is a monarchy and not a democracy) of Saudi Arabia has called our occupation of Iraq illegitimate.

Saudi Arabia's King Abdullah, one of the United States' closest Arab allies, called the American presence in Iraq "illegitimate" on Wednesday as he opened a two-day summit here of the Arab League.

The characterization came amid growing signs that Saudi Arabia is distancing itself from Bush administration policies in the region.

The octogenarian monarch, swathed in traditional robes and speaking in a pained voice, also characterized as "unjust" the U.S.-led financial embargo of the Hamas-led Palestinian Authority and urged its end in the wake of an agreement between Hamas and the moderate Fatah party to form a unity government.

Abdullah also criticized Arab leaders for infighting, which he said had caused nations to drift "further from unity than they were at the time of the founding of the Arab League," the 22-member body created in 1945.

Abdullah described a region awash with blood and beset by turmoil - from the sectarian battlegrounds of Iraq and Lebanon to the unresolved crisis in Sudan's Darfur region to brewing showdowns in Somalia and the Palestinian territories.

"In beloved Iraq, blood is shed among our brothers while there is an illegitimate foreign occupation and a hateful sectarianism that is threatening to develop into a civil war," the king said.

Abdullah neglected to mention the troubles in his own kingdom, where authorities are struggling to contain a radical Islamist movement and are cracking down on pro-reform activists.

"The real blame should be directed at us, the leaders of the Arab nation," Abdullah said. "Our constant disagreements and rejection of unity have made the Arab nation lose confidence in our sincerity and lose hope."

The king's remarks come at a time when Saudi Arabia is angling to bill itself as a regional power able to rein in warring factions and assert its authority in the face of a growing Iranian influence in the Middle East.

They told us there would be a domino effect of democracy spreading throughout the world. All I see are non-democratic nations being empowered even more. Imagine that!

Labels:

0 Comments:

Post a Comment

<< Home

Our Dictator Ally

I am always at a loss for words when I hear some pundits casually call the democratically elected Hugo Chavez of Venezuela a dictator. Yet, we are as thick as thieves with President Pervez Musharraf of Pakistan who came to power in a military coup. They are supposed to be headed for democracy but guess what? Pervez says maybe not!

The fight against international terrorism cannot be won without demilitarizing and deradicalizing Pakistan. That's what makes Pakistani President Pervez Musharraf's latest move so worrisome.

Mr. Musharraf took power more than seven years ago in a military coup. Since then, national conditions have markedly worsened. A military dictatorship justified as essential for bringing stability has actually taken the country to the edge.

Now, without drawing international attention, Musharraf has unveiled a plan that will make Pakistan's greatly awaited elections a farce. Under this plan, the outgoing parliament and four provincial legislatures would "elect" him to a new five-year term as president in the fall, before he oversees national polls a few months later. Five years ago, Musharraf orchestrated another charade – a referendum – to extend his self-declared presidency.

Musharraf's maneuver is the latest in a long series of broken promises to return his country to democracy. And it does not bode well for Pakistan's central challenge: moving away from militarism, extremism, and fundamentalism, and toward a stable, moderate state.

Labels: , ,

0 Comments:

Post a Comment

<< Home

What Is He Talking About?

Chris Matthews is such a tool sometimes. Aside from Ann Coulter and select other screeching right wing nutjobs, what college-educate women is he talking about?

Speaking on MSNBC's Imus In the Morning show today, Chris Matthews said: "You only hear criticism of Hillary Rodham Clinton from smart, college-educated women. They're the ones that always have a problem with her." Matthews then explained that men "are afraid to talk like that."

Bad grammar aside, Matthews' statement is almost funny when you consider that he, a man, has practically made a second career of criticizing Clinton--not for her policies or her votes in the Senate, but for her gender. In December of 2004, Matthews said on Hardball that a Clinton candidacy would "motivate all the men in the country to vote against her." In November of 2006, he wondered "What is she going to do about her husband? She makes an acceptance speech, and there he is, just standing behind her, smiling and applauding."

And the very next month, Matthews wondered whether Sen. Clinton was "convincing" as a mom.

In his interview with Imus, Matthews made a big deal over his speculation that Clinton "puts up" with her husband's lifestyle so that he will raise money for her. In other words, Sen. Clinton is a whore who will do anything to get elected, another version of the "Oh, my--Hillary is ambitious" song and dance we've heard from everyone from Matthews to Maureen Dowd.

Yes, Sen. Clinton is ambitious, as is Barack Obama, who had barely set foot in the Senate when he decided he should be president of the United States. Or Rudy Giuliani, who gives speeches against backdrops of the tragedy of September 11. Or Mitt Romney, who suddenly repudiated several values he had publicly held for years. Lucky them--no one is criticizing them for their ambition.

For the most part, it is men, men, men (Democrat or Republican)who seem to be scared shitless at the prospect of Hillary Clinton becoming President.

Labels: ,

0 Comments:

Post a Comment

<< Home

Wednesday, March 28, 2007

Beyond Ludicrous

I lost respect for John McCain so long ago but even I didn't think he'd start brazenly lying. What is wrong with him?

Yesterday, Sen. John McCain (R-AZ) told radio host Bill Bennett that President Bush’s escalation is working. “There are neighborhoods in Baghdad where you and I could walk through those neighborhoods, today,” he said. Today, when CNN’s Wolf Blitzer asked McCain why Americans still aren’t able to safely leave the Green Zone in Iraq, the senator replied that Blitzer was giving three-month-old talking points:

General Petraeus goes out there almost every day in an unarmed humvee. I think you oughta catch up. You are giving the old line of three months ago. I understand it. We certainly don’t get it through the filter of some of the media.

But according to CNN reporter Michael Ware, who has been in Iraq for four years, McCain is “way off base.” He stated, “To suggest that there’s any neighborhood in this city where an American can walk freely is beyond ludicrous. I’d love Sen. McCain to tell me where that neighborhood is and he and I can go for a stroll.”

Ware also rebutted McCain’s assertion that Petaeus travels in an unarmed humvee: “[I]n the hour since Sen. McCain’s said this, I’ve spoken to military sources and there was laughter down the line. I mean, certainly the general travels in a humvee. There’s multiple humvees around it, heavily armed.” Watch it:



Update: Then he goes on CNN trying to backpedal on the lie! Of course the people who listen to Bill Bennett's show would never hear the "correction" because they wouldn't watch CNN. He's really focusing on rallying a band of idiots to support him in the election (assuming that dirty bird Gulliani doesn't get the nomination).


Powered by ScribeFire.

0 Comments:

Post a Comment

<< Home

Beyond Ignorant!

I wonder how this ill bred vermin got into the game in the first place.

America's Serena Williams was the target of a racist heckler at the Sony Ericsson on Monday, but held her nerve to record a third round victory over Czech Lucie Safarova.

Late in her 6-3 6-4 win over Safarova, the three-times champion in Miami complained to chair umpire Joan Vornbaum about the verbal abuse being directed at her by a spectator, who she said had been harassing her the entire match.

The WTA confirmed the spectator was removed by security staff and turned over to Miami Dade police.

"The guy said, 'Hit the net like a Negro would'," Williams told reporters.

"I was shocked. I couldn't believe it. I had to do a double take. I think I hit a double fault at that point.

"Who says these things outside of first grade. At a professional venue you don't do that. It was shocking, I couldn't believe he would stoop to that level.

Playing in her first event since winning the Australian Open in January, Williams said she had tried to ignore the heckling but finally had enough when the taunts became racist.

"I really should have said something sooner," she added.

"Even the people out there were pointing to who he was.

"The guy was saying things that shouldn't have been said. It was derogatory.

"Then every time I missed a shot or serve, he would say, 'That's the way to do it'.

"It was outrageous. I couldn't believe what he said."


Powered by ScribeFire.

0 Comments:

Post a Comment

<< Home

Money Grubbing

I thought that the whole premise of this book not being published was because it was in poor, poor taste and that it was an insult to the families of the victims. Why, then, is Fred Goldman out to get the rights to the book and probably use it for profit?

The rights to O.J. Simpson's book, "If I Did It," will be auctioned off April 17.

The book, in which Simpson explains how he might have committed the killings of his ex-wife, Nicole Brown Simpson, and her friend Ron Goldman, has been the subject of a legal battle between the former NFL star and Goldman's family.

The book and companion TV interview were never released amid public outrage.

Notice of the auction to be held by the Sacramento County Sheriff's Department has been sent to publishers, Hollywood studios and talent agencies, Goldman family attorney David Cook said.

It's unknown who will bid on the rights, but Cook said the Goldmans will do so if needed.

As tacky as the entire concept of the whole book is, I never thought it was worth all of the hysteria and worth Judith Regan losing her job. To have this thing being sold and not buried just shows that people really don't care about the victims, families or OJ's idiotic antics. People, Ron Goldman at the helm, care about grubbing a dollar.

Powered by ScribeFire.

0 Comments:

Post a Comment

<< Home

Tuesday, March 27, 2007

This Is Where Stupid Takes You!

Then half of Europe wonders why they can't get immigrants to "assimilate."
German judge: No divorce for Muslim woman because abuse is part of her culture

This is so fucked up on so many levels. A judge in Germany refused to give a woman who was being beaten by her husband a speedy divorce because Muslim women should be accustomed to abuse.

In January, the judge turned down the wife’s request for a speedy divorce, saying that the husband’s behavior was not an unreasonable hardship because they were both Moroccan. “In this cultural background,” she wrote, “it is not unusual that the husband uses physical punishment against the wife.”

Uh huh.

0 Comments:

Post a Comment

<< Home

Kick His "Ask" Girlfriend!

0 Comments:

Post a Comment

<< Home

Saturday, March 24, 2007

The Record Is Broken

... and I wish he'd stop sounding like one. For crying out loud! This war that was supposed to be "weeks not months" has turned into four years! Soldiers are dying daily. They are losing minds, limbs, jobs, money and families. But the people who want to bring them home aren't supporting the troops.

Vice President Dick Cheney on Saturday accused the Democrat-led House of not supporting troops in Iraq and of sending a message to terrorists that America will retreat in the face danger.

"They're not supporting the troops. They're undermining them," Cheney told a gathering of the Republican Jewish Coalition at the oceanside Ritz-Carlton hotel in Manalapan, Fla., about 60 miles north of Miami.

On Friday, the House voted to clamp a cutoff deadline on the Iraq war, agreeing by a thin margin to pull combat troops out by next year.

The $124 billion House legislation would pay for wars in Iraq and Afghanistan this year but would require that combat troops come home from Iraq before September 2008 - or earlier if the Iraqi government does not meet certain requirements.

Cheney called it a myth that "one can support the troops without giving them the tools and reinforcements they need to carry out their mission."

President Bush has threatened to veto the legislation. Cheney said Bush will not withdraw troops before there is stability in Iraq.

"The American people have lost faith in the president's conduct of this war," House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., said after the passage. A message seeking comment was left with Pelosi's office Saturday.

0 Comments:

Post a Comment

<< Home

Maybe It's Me

But why is it that a movie called "The Frog Princess" not sound very princess-ey?

The Walt Disney Co. has started production on an animated musical fairy tale called "The Frog Princess," which will be set in New Orleans and feature the Walt Disney Studio's first black princess.

The company unveiled the plans at its annual shareholders' meeting in New Orleans.

John Lasseter, chief creative officer for Disney and the Disney-owned unit Pixar Animation Studios, said the movie would return to the classic hand-drawn animation process, instead of using computer animation that has become the industry standard. He called the film "an American fairy tale."

"The film's New Orleans setting and strong princess character give the film lots of excitement and texture," Walt Disney Studios Chairman Dick Cook said.

The movie will be scored by Randy Newman, who also wrote the music for Disney's "Toy Story," "A Bug's Life," "Toy Story 2," "Monsters, Inc." and "Cars."

Newman performed a song from the score for the shareholders.

John Musker and Ron Clements, who co-directed "The Little Mermaid," "Aladdin," and "Hercules" will co-direct the movie. The pair also wrote the story for the film.

Disney said its new animated princess -- Maddy -- will be added to its collection of animated princesses used at the company's theme parks and on consumer products.

The film is set for release in 2009.

I'm not a fairy tale kind of girl (though I did love the songs in the Roger's and Hammerstein's Cinderella) and haven't seen any of the any of the animated Disney films that have been released over the past couple of decades. But, while a lot of black folks are going "finally!," I am wondering why this "Maddy" character has to be linked to frogs ... and why is her name Maddy (sounds like Mattie the maid to me)? I'm sure the finished product will be great, I'm just not too thrilled about the theme. Thank god I don't have a little girl who would force me to go see it with her.

0 Comments:

Post a Comment

<< Home

Friday, March 23, 2007

Pants on FI--UR!

This man lies like a rug. He knew!

Attorney General Alberto Gonzales approved plans to fire several U.S. attorneys in a November meeting, according to documents released Friday that contradict earlier claims that he was not closely involved in the dismissals.

The Nov. 27 meeting, in which the attorney general and at least five top Justice Department officials participated, focused on a five-step plan for carrying out the firings of the prosecutors, Justice Department officials said late Friday.

There, Gonzales signed off on the plan, which was crafted by his chief of staff, Kyle Sampson. Sampson resigned last week amid a political firestorm surrounding the firings.

The documents indicated that the hour-long morning discussion, held in the attorney general's conference room, was the only time Gonzales met with top aides who decided which prosecutors to fire and how to do it.

Justice spokeswoman Tasia Scolinos said it was not immediately clear whether Gonzales gave his final approval to begin the firings at that meeting. Scolinos also said Gonzales was not involved in the process of selecting which prosecutors would be asked to resign.

On March 13, in explaining the firings, Gonzales told reporters he was aware that some of the dismissals were being discussed but was not involved in them.

"I knew my chief of staff was involved in the process of determining who were the weak performers - where were the districts around the country where we could do better for the people in that district, and that's what I knew," Gonzales said last week. "But that is in essence what I knew about the process; was not involved in seeing any memos, was not involved in any discussions about what was going on. That's basically what I knew as the attorney general."

0 Comments:

Post a Comment

<< Home

Because They Know Bush Is Crazy

They are preparing for our attack just in case.

Several foreign embassies in Teheran are updating their emergency evacuation plans should a Western or Israeli attack on Iran occur.

According to foreign sources, foreign diplomats believe a possible attack would take place before the end of 2007. By that time, Iran might have enough enriched uranium to cause a humanitarian and environmental catastrophe from radioactive fallout should its nuclear facilities be damaged or destroyed in an attack.

Embassies in all countries generally have evacuation plans for their staff, but foreign sources describe the general atmosphere in Iran as one of heightened preparedness. Recently, several diplomatic missions based in Teheran have begun to reassess their plans, and embassies without permanent security officers have requested them.

Embassy experts reportedly are testing various evacuation options and logistics, such as timing routes to different destinations by different types of vehicles. The plans include evacuation for all staff.


Powered by ScribeFire.

0 Comments:

Post a Comment

<< Home

Oh Boy! A Third Front

Iraq is coming apart even at the one seam that was still slip stitched closed. I'm closing my eyes.

The US is scrambling to head off a "disastrous" Turkish military intervention in Kurdish-controlled northern Iraq that threatens to derail the Baghdad security surge and open up a third front in the battle to save Iraq from disintegration.

Senior Bush administration officials have assured Turkey in recent days that US forces will increase efforts to root out Kurdistan Workers' party (PKK) guerrillas enjoying safe haven in the Qandil mountains, on the Iraq-Iran-Turkey border.

But Abdullah Gul, Turkey's foreign minister, MPs, military chiefs and diplomats say up to 3,800 PKK fighters are preparing for attacks in south-east Turkey — and Turkey is ready to hit back if the Americans fail to act. "We will do what we have to do, we will do what is necessary. Nothing is ruled out," Mr Gul said. "I have said to the Americans many times: suppose there is a terrorist organisation in Mexico attacking America. What would you do?... We are hopeful. We have high expectations. But we cannot just wait forever."

Turkish sources said "hot pursuit" special forces operations in Khaftanin and Qanimasi, northern Iraq, were already under way. Murat Karayilan, a PKK leader, said this week that a "mad war" was in prospect unless Ankara backed off.

Fighting between security forces and Kurdish fighters seeking autonomy or independence for Kurdish-dominated areas of south-east Turkey has claimed 37,000 lives since 1984. The last big Turkish operation occurred 10 years ago, when 40,000 troops pushed deep into Iraq. But intervention in the coming weeks would be the first since the US took control of Iraq in 2003 and would risk direct confrontation between Turkish troops and Iraqi Kurdish forces and their US allies.


Powered by ScribeFire.

0 Comments:

Post a Comment

<< Home

What's This? Cutting and Running?

But, I guess after you shoot up a bunch of innocent people, that's the honorable thing to do.

Marines accused of shooting and killing civilians after a suicide bombing in Afghanistan are under U.S. investigation, and their entire unit has been ordered to leave the country, officials said Friday.

Army Maj. Gen. Francis H. Kearney III, head of Special Operations Command Central, ordered the unit of about 120 Marines out of Afghanistan and initiated an investigation into the March 4 incident, said Lt. Col. Lou Leto, spokesman at Kearney's command headquarters in Tampa, Fla.

It is highly unusual for any combat unit, either special operations or conventional, to have its mission cut short.

A spokesman for the Marine unit, Maj. Cliff Gilmore, said it is in the process of leaving Afghanistan, but he declined to provide details on the timing and new location, citing a need for security.

In the March 4 incident in Nangahar province, an explosives-rigged minivan crashed into a convoy of Marines that U.S. officials said also came under fire from gunmen. As many as 10 Afghans were killed and 34 wounded as the convoy made an escape. Injured Afghans said the Americans fired on civilian cars and pedestrians as they sped away.

U.S. military officials said militant gunmen shot at Marines and may have caused some of the civilian casualties.

President Hamid Karzai condemned the incident, which was one among several involving U.S. forces in which civilians were killed and injured.

Leto, the spokesman at Special Operations Command Central headquarters, said the Marines, after being ambushed, responded in a way that created "perceptions (that) have really damaged the relationship between the local population and this unit."

Therefore, he said, "the general felt it was best to move them out of that area."


Powered by ScribeFire.

0 Comments:

Post a Comment

<< Home

$500 For That There Baby

Isn't this illegal or something? What is wrong with these folks? This precious fetus that folks are willing to blow up clinics over is only worth $500? What is it that they don't get that pregnancy isn't some process carried out on an assembly line? What would $500 cover in terms of a woman's bodily changes, expenses and emotional well being? It's clear that these people really don't view women as anything other than breeders. But $500 to endure pregnancy then sell the baby is insulting!

Ah Texas. Via culturekitchen we find out that Sen. Dan Patrick, a Republican talk-radio host from Houston and opponent of women's repro rights, is proposing a bill that would pay women $500 for giving their babies up for adoption rather than having abortions.

Under Patrick's SB 1567, AKA the Texas Baby Purchasing Act of 2007, women would qualify for a $500 payment from the state within 60 days of signing away all parental rights to their newborn children.

Wow, what a fucking deal! As Amanda notes, that's a baby-making wage of $.07 an hour. And they say republicans don't value women!

Someone mentioned this on an email list I'm on, and I had the same thought: this reminds me of the oh-so-lovely group that targets poor women and women of color to get sterilized for cash.

It's just so fucking insulting, I don't have the words.

Luckily, Bitch PhD does:

Honey, $500 isn't even going to pay for the extra groceries you'll eat during a pregnancy. Let alone the prenatal care, if you're not insured or on Medicaid, or the cost of the birth.

Senator Patrick, would you agree to take care of a neighbor's dog for nine months for a measly $500? Where the fuck do you get the balls to offer women $500 to rent out their uteruses and sell their children?


I think that men should be barred from the abortion discussion - particularly those who should have been one.

Powered by ScribeFire.

0 Comments:

Post a Comment

<< Home

Baby Too Black!

Are these people stupid, ignorant or both? What is it that they don't understand about genetics? If people of two different races mix, there is no telling what the child will look like. There will rarely be a perfect blend of the skin complexions of the parents coming out in the children. I know many, many people who are either lighter or darker than both of their parents. What race does this woman think she is? Regardless of where she is from, she looks like what is considered "black" in America. So the baby looks a slight (and I do mean slight) bit darker than the other child ('cause the baby looks to be the same color as the mama in my eyes). How can she call this child a "terrible mistake?"



After they saw a baby girl they had gone to a fertility clinic to conceive, her parents became convinced something was wrong, according to court papers.

The girl's skin was darker than either parent's, a judge wrote in allowing the parents to proceed with a lawsuit that claims the clinic botched the insemination of the wife's eggs. The ruling was made public Wednesday.

"While we love Baby Jessica as our own, we are reminded of this terrible mistake each and every time we look at her; it is simply impossible to ignore," state Supreme Court Justice Sheila Abdus-Salaam's decision quoted parents Thomas and Nancy Andrews as saying.

"We are conscious of and distressed by this mistake each and every time we appear in public," the judge quoted the Andrewses' affidavit as saying.

The couple, of Commack, N.Y., sued New York Medical Services for Reproductive Medicine, accusing the Manhattan clinic of medical malpractice and other offenses.

The Andrewses' court papers say that on the advice of Dr. Martin Keltz, the couple agreed to in vitro fertilization of the eggs with Thomas Andrews' sperm so they could have a child who was biologically their own. However, their court papers say, the clinic was negligent and used another man's sperm.

Three DNA tests -- a home kit and two professional laboratory tests -- confirmed that Thomas Andrews was not the baby's father, the judge quoted the couple as saying.

The judge said the Andrewses complain that they have been forced to raise a child who is "not even the same race, nationality, color ... as they are."

Just when it seems that black Americans are phasing out of the color complex issues that have plagued us since slavery, these new immigrants (also impacted by colonialism and imperialism) are coming here and starting the same stuff over again. The real issue to me is these folks coming here thinking they are getting something special when they find somebody white when some of these creepy, reject men would be on their way out of the gene pool in their own communities.

That baby got the "darker skin" from the mother, not the father, or does she not understand the African influence in the Dominican Republic? Yes, they have an issue if they gave her the wrong sperm but that child is not of a different race. She is her mother's race. She needs to be thankful the child doesn't look more like that ugly dude she married ... thinking she was going to have some white looking child. I sure hope they don't talk like that around the house or that child will be screwed up for life!

Powered by ScribeFire.

2 Comments:

At 10:21 AM, Anonymous Soror V. said...

As I said elsewhere, Jessica needs to be taken away from this horrible excuse of a "mother." Sorry. You're going to mistreat the baby because she's darker? I can understand them being pissed about the clinic mix-up, but I can't imagine how this plays out as she grows up.
Nancy Andrews, you s-u-c-k.

 
At 7:59 PM, Blogger PC said...

When I read this, all I could do was shake my head and cry. What is wrong with people?

The saddest thing about all of this is that noone is going to take Jessica away from these sorry excuses for parents. :(

For some reason, black Hispanics do not want to classify themselves as such - I even have had Dominicans try to FORCE me to "admit" that I am "one of us" versus "one of those people." How ignorant.

 

Post a Comment

<< Home

Update On The Mess We've Made

A few news nuggets via Juan Cole.
US troops found caches of chlorine and nitric acid in guerrilla storehouses in the Ghazaliya district of Baghdad on Thursday, raising the specter that the guerrillas are increasingly turning to chemical weapons. They have conducted several attacks using chlorine gas.

The US is attempting to avert a potentially disastrous Turkish military intervention in Iraqi Kurdistan. The Turks accuse Kurdistan of harboring 3600 guerrillas of the radical Kurdish Workers' Party (PKK), who, it says, are committing acts of terrorism in eastern Anatolia and then slipping back over the border into Iraq. Turkish Foreign Minister Abdullah Gul is threatening hot pursuit by Turkish troops across that border. Such an incursion could set off the tinderbox that is northern Iraq.

Prince Hassan of Jordan supports Turkey in this regard. He warns against an ethno-religious breakup of Iraq, saying it will lead to the Balkanization of the entire Middle East.

Total's CEO has been detained in connection with a bribery charge related to Total's interest in Iranian petroleum.

Iraqi Christians are being forced to flee their country by the violence and because they are sometimes targeted by Sunni Arab guerrillas who wrongly associate them with the West. This article estimates them at 5% of the Iraqi population, which is probably incorrect. There were 800,000 or so of them before the war, but my understanding is that they may be down to 500,000 now, which would make them 2 percent of the population. Likewise, it strikes me as highly unlikely that 40% of Iraqis fleeing the country are Christian. The vast majority of Iraqi expatriates (some 800,000) in Jordan are Sunni Arabs, e.g.

There is so little safe water in Iraq that this summer a major cholera epidemic could break out, the UN is warning.

0 Comments:

Post a Comment

<< Home

No More Discounts!

Well, I doubt college students are going to stop having sex so this just looks like a recipe for disaster.


Millions of college students are suddenly facing sharply higher prices for birth control, prompting concerns among health officials that some will shift to less preferred contraceptives or stop using them altogether.

Prices for oral contraceptives, or birth control pills, are doubling and tripling at student health centers, the result of a complex change in the Medicaid rebate law that essentially ends an incentive for drug companies to provide deep discounts to colleges.

"It's a tremendous problem for our students because not every student has a platinum card," said Hugh Jessop, executive director of the health center at Indiana University.

There, he said, women are paying about $22 per month for prescriptions that cost $10 a few months ago. "Some of our students have two jobs, have children," Jessop said. "To increase this by 100 percent or more overnight, which is what happened, is a huge shock to them and to their system."

They can give a discount on contraception or give a discount on pre-natal care and abortions. Choice seems simple to me.

0 Comments:

Post a Comment

<< Home

This Is Harassment!

This is insane! How are you going to make someone look at an ultra sound? How can you pass a law to force someone to have a medical procedure. These zygote/fetus freaks are out of control.

With calls of emotional blackmail from opponents, a measure requiring women seeking abortions to first review ultrasound images of their fetuses advanced Wednesday in the South Carolina Legislature.

The legislation, supported by Republican Gov. Mark Sanford, passed 91-23 after lawmakers defeated amendments exempting rape or incest. The House must approve the bill again in a routine vote before it goes to the Senate, where its sponsor expects it to pass with those exemptions.

Some states make ultrasound images available to women before an abortion, but South Carolina would be alone in requiring women to view the pictures.

Critics consider the proposal a tool to intimidate women who already have made an agonizing decision.

"You love them in the womb, but once they get here, it's a different story," said Rep. Gilda Cobb-Hunter, a Democrat and a social worker. "You're sitting here passing judgment? Who gave you the right?"

Proponents hope women will change their minds after seeing an ultrasound.

I am pro-life outside of the womb. The forced pregnancy/pro-birth people seem to fade into the woodwork after women (i.e. baby machines) give birth. I love babies more than most folks but I also want every baby to be wanted and be a welcome addition to a family. There are far too many abused, neglected and unwanted children growing up in poverty, headed for the prison system and just plain living nightmarish lives. You can't make life about getting here. You have to make it about being here and being happy, productive and safe.

0 Comments:

Post a Comment

<< Home

Wednesday, March 21, 2007

In Addition To Being A Big Fat Idiot ...

I agree! He's irrelevant
After repeatedly being asked about his conservative critics, including talk show host Rush Limbaugh, Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger dropped his diplomatic veneer Tuesday and declared their views irrelevant to his work in California.

"All irrelevant. Rush Limbaugh is irrelevant. I am not his servant," the governor said on NBC's "Today" show.

Limbaugh then declared on his radio program that Schwarzenegger, lacking the communications skills to persuade Californians of his Republican values, had sold them out.

"If he had the leadership skills to articulate conservative principles and win over the public as [former President] Reagan did, then he would have stayed conservative," said Limbaugh, who is often seen as the embodiment of all conservative viewpoints.

Uh, yeah ... People loved the President with Alzheimer's (and I knew something wasn't right with Reagan long before he left office) the way they love dumb Dubya. That says a lot about that crowd.

The tiff marked Schwarzenegger's most high-profile repudiation of a conservative critic. Many fellow Republicans view his support of stem-cell research, mandatory curbs on carbon dioxide emissions and universal healthcare as a betrayal of his party's ideals.

In the NBC interview, Schwarzenegger said he was "the people's servant of California. What they call me — Democrat or Republican or in the center, this and that — that is not my bottom line. This is for them to talk about."

Limbaugh said in an interview after his radio show that Schwarzenegger's recent agreements with Democrats in the Legislature "are not compromises, they are capitulations."

The governor, he said, may have been "just tired of answering questions about me, and he wanted to say … 'I don't work for Rush Limbaugh, I work for the people of California.' "

Even though I went to the polls with a mallet to knock down all of those proposed initiatives during the Governator's special election, I must say that after he got his butt kicked, he changed his tune drastically and became a Governor who listened to the people - not a servant of his narrow party. I still didn't vote to re-elect him last November but I knew he was going to win and was okay with it. So, ditto on the irrelevancy of Rush Limbaugh and every other ridiculous blow hard with no real input.

0 Comments:

Post a Comment

<< Home

Tuesday, March 20, 2007

Unholy AI Guy

Oh Gees! Will these godbags stop?! Just because someone isn't singing Jesus in every verse doesn't mean that they aren't Christian or that they aren't a good Christian. Chris Sligh is one of my favorites on American Idol and I had no idea he was ultra "Christian." He just seems like a really nice guy with a good voice.
Chris Sligh, the "American Idol" contestant who has won fans thanks to his curly mop of hair and soulful voice, has a few people concerned with his departure from strictly Christian music. But for most others in this city of 56,000 about 100 miles southwest of Charlotte, N.C., Sligh has become a hometown hero.

Jonathan Pait, a spokesman for fundamentalist Bob Jones University where Sligh attended for several years, said: "We really are somewhat disappointed with the direction he has gone musically."

He nonetheless tunes in each week to monitor Sligh's progress.

Local fans — some wearing fake glasses and curly wigs and calling themselves the "Fro Patro" — gather each week at restaurants and bars to cheer Sligh on. The local newspaper has been tracking his progress on its Web site.

Sligh, a 28-year-old son of missionaries who spent much of his childhood overseas, kept his spot among the 11 remaining finalists last week with a rendition of "Endless Love." He'll try to improve on that performance, deemed "unemotional" and "uninspiring" by judge Simon Cowell, this week. The show will announce results Wednesday evening.

People who know Sligh well say that he may be singing rock 'n' roll on television, but he's always clear about the faith that motivates his music.

"He's not going to back away from the fact that he's a Christian," said Chris Surratt, pastor of Seacoast Church, where Sligh has been music leader for more than two years. "He's going to let that shine through in what he does."

Hundreds of people gather each week to hear Sligh's music at Seacoast, where his electric guitar and vocals have become an integral part of services, Surratt said.

Support for Sligh also is strong at North Greenville University, the small Baptist school he attended for several years after leaving Bob Jones in the late 1990s.

Cheryl Greene, the professor who helped Sligh hone his vocal talents, said just because Sligh may not be singing strictly Christian-themed songs shouldn't reflect on the depth of his faith.

"It would be like me being in a jazz band," Greene said. "You can be a Christian or non-Christian. It's a style of music."

But Greene said she still has worries over Sligh's long-term spiritual journey.

"Is he going to stand strong by his true Christian morals?" Greene said. "Christianity is a lifestyle ... and there are things in your life that you do need to stand for."

John Jeter, the owner of a Greenville nightclub where Sligh has performed with his band, said Sligh's wholesome attitude and his faith come through in his music.

"It speaks well to the fact that it's not all blood, guts and trash," said Jeter. "Music doesn't have to be filthy. You can have a good time in a good environment, and Chris is proof of that."

I don't see why these folks have to paint themselves with such a narrow brush. Last I knew, good Christians were a diverse group of people with various interests and different lives. Leave it to folks like this to put Christians in a tiny little box that is hidden from plain sight. Way to spread the word, dude!

0 Comments:

Post a Comment

<< Home

Friday, March 16, 2007

I Am Sullied -- No More

This is sad but indicative of what this war is doing to the hearts and minds of our own soldiers.
"Thanks for telling me it was a good day until I briefed you. [Redacted name] -- You are only interested in your career and provide no support to your staff -- no msn [mission] support and you don't care. I cannot support a msn that leads to corruption, human right abuses and liars. I am sullied -- no more. I didn't volunteer to support corrupt, money grubbing contractors, nor work for commanders only interested in themselves. I came to serve honorably and feel dishonored. I trust no Iraqi. I cannot live this way. All my love to my family, my wife and my precious children. I love you and trust you only. Death before being dishonored any more. Trust is essential -- I don't know who trust anymore. [sic] Why serve when you cannot accomplish the mission, when you no longer believe in the cause, when your every effort and breath to succeed meets with lies, lack of support, and selfishness? No more. Reevaluate yourselves, cdrs [commanders]. You are not what you think you are and I know it.

COL Ted Westhusing

Life needs trust. Trust is no more for me here in Iraq."

I'm not sure what is worse: that he actually believed in the false ideals of the mission in the first place or that the realization that he'd been lied to was to much for him to bear. Any man who'd chose death over seeing his wife and children again was mortally wounded by the Bush's farce and not his own hand.

0 Comments:

Post a Comment

<< Home

Thursday, March 15, 2007

What They Signed Up For

I, too, am sick of hearing people brush off pity for the Guardsmen and reservists whose lives have been turned upside down and/or ruined because of lengthy tours of duty in Iraq by claiming that they volunteered to do it. They DID NOT sign up for that.
What the television ad promised: "One weekend a month, two weeks a year. Earn money for college and protect your local community." That's what citizen soldiers signed up for. While they were certainly aware of the dual mission, they believed the recruiters who told them that they'd never get deployed; that the only way they'd see combat is "if World War III broke out." Since 2001, "four out of five guardsmen have been sent overseas in the largest deployment of the National Guard since World War II." (Stateline.org, January 12, 2007) Over 400 Army National Guard soldiers have died in Iraq, more than quadruple the amount that died in the entire Vietnam War.

For more than half a century, the National Guard's policy regarding mobilization was that Guardsmen would be required to serve no more than one year cumulative on active duty (with no more than six months overseas) for each five years of regular drill. After September 11, 2001, the possible mobilization time was increased to 18 months (with no more than one year overseas). Then it was increased again, to 24 months. That policy was effectively abandoned by the Pentagon in January of 2007 because it's the only way they can continue to redeploy Iraq War veterans/Reservists. The cumulative number of days Guard soldiers called to duty [rose] from 12.7 million in 2001 to 68.3 million in 2005, according to the Los Angeles Times.

The constant changes to policy, time and terms of deployment, extensions, stop-loss, etc, are, in fact, not what they signed up for when they took an oath to protect the Constitution from "threats both foreign and domestic."

0 Comments:

Post a Comment

<< Home

I've Got A Bridge

I'd love to sell it if any of you believe that this man confessed to everything but killing Christ. What kind of fools do they think we are?
The al Qaeda suspect who claimed responsibility for the September 11 attacks also said he beheaded U.S. journalist Daniel Pearl, according to a Pentagon transcript released on Thursday.

During a hearing at the Guantanamo Bay prison camp on Saturday, Khalid Sheikh Mohammed said he was involved in more than 30 attacks or plots. The Pentagon said it had withheld sections on Pearl's 2002 killing until it could inform the reporter's family.

"I decapitated with my blessed right hand the head of the American Jew Daniel Pearl," Mohammed said in a statement, according to the transcript.

"For those who would like to confirm, there are pictures of me on the Internet holding his head," said the statement read by a member of the U.S. military assigned to assist Pakistani national Mohammed at the hearing.

Pearl, a 38-year-old reporter for the Wall Street Journal, was kidnapped and killed in Pakistan in 2002.

During Saturday's closed hearing, Mohammed also claimed responsibility for a nightclub bombing in Bali, Indonesia, and an attempt to down two American airplanes using shoe bombs, according to a Pentagon transcript released on Wednesday.

Some security experts suggested Mohammed, alleged by U.S. officials to have been al Qaeda's external operations chief, was exaggerating his importance and questioned his reliability after years in custody subjected to harsh interrogation.

But Mohammed, who was arrested in Pakistan in March 2003 and handed over to U.S. agents, is widely considered to have been a senior al Qaeda figure.

U.S. officials say he was the chief planner of the September 11 attacks and a main suspect in the Pearl case.

During the military hearing, Mohammed himself spoke about Pearl's killing and said it was not an al Qaeda operation.

"It's like beheading Daniel Pearl. It's not related to al Qaida (Qaeda)," the transcript quoted him as saying.

This is positively hilarious!

0 Comments:

Post a Comment

<< Home

Spoofing Jesus

I saw a clip of this guy on Good Morning America today. I tried to assume it was a joke because if it is reality he is making men look worse than he thinks they do already.
Three hundred men -- all Christian -- gathered behind closed doors at a Tennessee mall trying to figure out the difference between being "nice" (which is not good) and being "good" (which is). They struggled in the dimly lit hall -- after a Christian rock band handed it off to the comic in charge -- to make sense of the message they were hearing from the stage: that church has been "feminized" and that the Jesus talked about in many modern churches is too wimpy and gentle.

The men had to decide by day's end (that is, after six hours of listening) whether they were ready to take up the challenge of becoming a "Christian warrior" modeled on the "manlier" version of Christ they were told has been overlooked -- the Christ who took a whip to moneychangers, and used the word "dung" when he had to.

This was GodMen, a movement that is still a work in progress, according to principle founder Brad Stine, who calls himself "America's comic" and is often written up as "the Christian comic."

Stine is convinced that American men in general, and Christian men in particular, have surrendered their masculinity to the shackles of political correctness, especially within the framework of the typical present day church. So he started GodMen as an antidote, to be a place, he says, "where men can be fully men." Or, as the posters for the mall event put it: "GodMen, When Faith Gets Dangerous."

Watch the story tonight on "Nightline" at 11:35 p.m.

There have only been two GodMen events so far, both in Franklin, Tenn. But more are scheduled for the coming year in six other states.

In reality, the most recent event was more seminar than hunting trip. A series of lecturers took the stage, interspersed with "guys'" entertainment like a strongman bending wrenches in half with his bare hands, and video clips of NFL bloopers.

When the laughter died down, however, more serious messages were delivered, most notably by a Christian writer named Paul Coughlin, author of "No More Christian Nice Guy," who laid out the main theme of the day:

"I want to encourage you to be good instead of nice," he told the assembled, several of whom were pastors from churches in the South and Midwest. "But know that you are going to make enemies in the process."

And that, Coughlin argued, can be a good thing. Coughlin contends that the Christian man in America has become passive, straitjacketed by a church culture that insists he emulate a version of Christ who is mild to an extreme, almost "wimpy" in some eyes. This Jesus avoids confrontation, is overly patient and is devoted -- to a fault -- to the dictum "turn the other cheek."

Coughlin can be blunt; in his book, he calls this version of Jesus the "Bearded Lady."

"The fact is," he told the gathering, "a meek and mild Jesus eventually is a bore. He doesn't inspire us." The same applies, he argued, to a meek and mild man. "Those men end up divorced," Coughlin said. "Their wives find them boring. They have no -- I call it the 'jalapeno factor' -- in them. There's no inner heat that causes them to actively, assertively go out and do what needs to be done as a man."

This fixation with Jesus going off on the money changers is getting old. You've got an entire New Testament, he throws one little tantrum and everyone wants to use it as their excuse to act a fool.

0 Comments:

Post a Comment

<< Home

America Ready For A Retarded President

They should have known not to ask Chris Rock a question like this:

In an interview with Life magazine, comedian Chris Rock takes a politically incorrect tack, using the word "retarded" which only the retrograde would utter these days when referring to the mentally challenged, no?

The word came up when Rock was asked if America is ready for a black president.

Here's the exchange:


LIFE: In the first movie you directed, Head of State, you were president of the United States. Is this country ready for an African American president?

ROCK: It's ready for a retarded president, why wouldn't it be ready for an African-American president?

LIFE: So, of the current presidential contenders, who do you like best?

ROCK: I like Al Gore, actually. (A) He’s more qualified than everyone that's running on the Democratic side. (B) If he won or didn’t win, he has an agenda to help people and make this a better world. . . . Maybe Barack will win, but I probably won’t see a black president. There’s real equality when you don't notice [race], you don't even talk about it. I probably won’t live to see


0 Comments:

Post a Comment

<< Home

Limbless? Go Back To Iraq!

This is sheer madness. Can this war be anymore of a failure? If we have to resort to sending injured soldiers back into the arena, we've long since lost the fight.
"This is not right," said Master Sgt. Ronald Jenkins, who has been ordered to Iraq even though he has a spine problem that doctors say would be damaged further by heavy Army protective gear. "This whole thing is about taking care of soldiers," he said angrily. "If you are fit to fight you are fit to fight. If you are not fit to fight, then you are not fit to fight."

As the military scrambles to pour more soldiers into Iraq, a unit of the Army's 3rd Infantry Division at Fort Benning, Ga., is deploying troops with serious injuries and other medical problems, including GIs who doctors have said are medically unfit for battle. Some are too injured to wear their body armor, according to medical records.

On Feb. 15, Master Sgt. Jenkins and 74 other soldiers with medical conditions from the 3rd Division's 3rd Brigade were summoned to a meeting with the division surgeon and brigade surgeon. These are the men responsible for handling each soldier's "physical profile," an Army document that lists for commanders an injured soldier's physical limitations because of medical problems -- from being unable to fire a weapon to the inability to move and dive in three-to-five-second increments to avoid enemy fire. Jenkins and other soldiers claim that the division and brigade surgeons summarily downgraded soldiers' profiles, without even a medical exam, in order to deploy them to Iraq. It is a claim division officials deny.

The 3,900-strong 3rd Brigade is now leaving for Iraq for a third time in a steady stream. In fact, some of the troops with medical conditions interviewed by Salon last week are already gone. Others are slated to fly out within a week, but are fighting against their chain of command, holding out hope that because of their ills they will ultimately not be forced to go. Jenkins, who is still in Georgia, thinks doctors are helping to send hurt soldiers like him to Iraq to make units going there appear to be at full strength. "This is about the numbers," he said flatly.

That is what worries Steve Robinson, director of veterans affairs at Veterans for America, who has long been concerned that the military was pressing injured troops into Iraq. "Did they send anybody down range that cannot wear a helmet, that cannot wear body armor?" Robinson asked rhetorically. "Well that is wrong. It is a war zone." Robinson thinks that the possibility that physical profiles may have been altered improperly has the makings of a scandal. "My concerns are that this needs serious investigation. You cannot just look at somebody and tell that they were fit," he said. "It smacks of an overstretched military that is in crisis mode to get people onto the battlefield."
[...]
Another soldier contacted Salon by telephone last week expressed considerable anxiety, in a frightened tone, about deploying to Iraq in her current condition. (She also wanted to remain anonymous, fearing retribution.) An incident during training several years ago injured her back, forcing doctors to remove part of her fractured coccyx. She suffers from degenerative disk disease and has two ruptured disks and a bulging disk in her back. While she said she loves the Army and would like to deploy after back surgery, her current injuries would limit her ability to wear her full protective gear. She deployed to Iraq last week, the day after calling Salon.

Her husband, who has served three combat tours in the infantry in Afghanistan and Iraq, said he is worried sick because his wife's protective vest alone exceeds the maximum amount she is allowed to lift. "I have been over there three times. I know what it is like," he told me during lunch at a restaurant here. He predicted that by deploying people like his wife, the brigade leaders are "going to get somebody killed over there." He said there is "no way" Grigsby is going to keep all of the injured soldiers in safe jobs. "All of these people that deploy with these profiles, they are scared," he said. He railed at the command: "They are saying they don't care about your health. This is pathetic. It is bad."

Unbelievable!

0 Comments:

Post a Comment

<< Home

Monday, March 12, 2007

Equal Justice

I feel like I just read stepped into a history book. These people must feel pretty frickin' empowered and superior to think they can get away with this. A white boy kills two people and gets probation. A white girl burns down her parent's house and gets probation. A black girl pushes a hall monitor and gets seven years. Are they flippin' kidding?
The public fairgrounds in this small east Texas town look ordinary enough, like so many other well-worn county fair sites across the nation. Unless you know the history of the place.

There are no plaques or markers to denote it, but several of the most notorious public lynchings of black Americans in the late 19th and early 20th Centuries were staged at the Paris Fairgrounds, where thousands of white spectators would gather to watch and cheer as black men were dragged onto a scaffold, scalded with hot irons and finally burned to death or hanged.

Brenda Cherry, a local civil rights activist, can see the fairgrounds from the front yard of her modest home, in the heart of the "black" side of this starkly segregated town of 26,000. And lately, Cherry says, she's begun to wonder whether the racist legacy of those lynchings is rebounding in a place that calls itself "the best small town in Texas."

"Some of the things that happen here would not happen if we were in Dallas or Houston," Cherry said. "They happen because we are in this closed town. I compare it to 1930s."

There was the 19-year-old white man, convicted last July of criminally negligent homicide for killing a 54-year-old black woman and her 3-year-old grandson with his truck, who was sentenced in Paris to probation and required to send an annual Christmas card to the victims' family.

There are the Paris public schools, which are under investigation by the U.S. Education Department after repeated complaints that administrators discipline black students more frequently, and more harshly, than white students.

And then there is the case that most troubles Cherry and leaders of the Texas NAACP, involving a 14-year-old black freshman, Shaquanda Cotton, who shoved a hall monitor at Paris High School in a dispute over entering the building before the school day had officially begun.

The youth had no prior arrest record, and the hall monitor--a 58-year-old teacher's aide--was not seriously injured. But Shaquanda was tried in March 2006 in the town's juvenile court, convicted of "assault on a public servant" and sentenced by Lamar County Judge Chuck Superville to prison for up to 7 years, until she turns 21.

Just three months earlier, Superville sentenced a 14-year-old white girl, convicted of arson for burning down her family's house, to probation.

"All Shaquanda did was grab somebody and she will be in jail for 5 or 6 years?" said Gary Bledsoe, an Austin attorney who is president of the state NAACP branch. "It's like they are sending a signal to black folks in Paris that you stay in your place in this community, in the shadows, intimidated."

The Tribune generally does not identify criminal suspects younger than age 17, but is doing so in this case because the girl and her family have chosen to go public with their story.

This is the kind of story that needs to be front page news anytime people think that America has no racial issues and that all things are equal. No, they are not - not by a long shot.

Labels: ,

42 Comments:

At 7:17 PM, Blogger Abyss120 said...

I read that aricle in the Tribune and it was mind blowing! I was shocked and saddened at the same time. What they did to that little girl was ridiculous

 
At 12:50 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

I agree that the punishment for Shaquanda Cotton is excessive, but many parts of this story have been taken out of context.

The comment about a 19 year old white man killing two black people and getting probation is the most egregious. The white man was convicted of criminally negligent homicide because of an automobile accident. A car containing a 53 year old black woman, her son, and her three year old grandson was stopped on a busy farm-to-market road in preparation to turn. The white male was not paying attention to the road and ran into the car, killing the woman and child. This was a tragic accident, but is being taken out of context. To the average reader that does not know the background information, the description sounds like a murder. That was most definately not the case.

There is a great deal of relevant information that is being left out of the Chicago Tribune story about Ms. Cotton to help give the impression that there is pervasive racism in Paris, Texas. There were black administrators and teachers who testified against Ms. Cotton in court, and recommended that she receive a stiff sentence because she was a habitual offender at school. I still contend that she received too severe a sentence since she did not have a criminal record, but it is not as though a group consisting entirely of whites conspired to teach blacks in Paris, Texas a lesson.

There were black leaders in the community who spoke up in support of Paris ISD, and its good treatment of students regardless of their race. The complaints against Paris ISD were found to be without merit during the investigations. What became evident is that there is a significant parenting problem, not a school district that singles out black students for more severe punishment.

As to the segregation in Paris, I doubt very seriously as to whether or not there is a single community in America in which the citizens do not, to a large extent, voluntarily segregate themselves. I am not saying that voluntary segregation is a good thing, but to attempt to label a community racist because of it would be as absurd as calling a business that caters to blacks more than whites (for instance a black barber shop) racist against whites.

I live in Paris, and the neighborhood that I live in is comprised of both white and black families right next to each other. To say that there is no racism in Paris would be just as inaccurate as to say that there is no racism in Detroit or Miami or New York, but it is dying. There are whites who are racist against blacks and blacks who are racist against whites in every single town in this nation. That's a damn shame, but the truth is it's dying.

Trying to interject racism into a situation in which there is none only serves to perpetuate that which a community is unfairly being accused of.

 
At 1:01 PM, Blogger Mother said...

Dear Anonymous:

Shaquanda's punishment is not simply excessive--it is barbaric. There's no way to take that out of context.

You brought up the 19-year-old who killed two people in an auto accident because, as you put it, he wasn't paying attention. What was his sentence? You didn't mention that. He was convicted of criminally negligent homicide. The jury recommended he serve 5 years in prsion BUT the judge reduced his sentence to 10 years PROBATION. His "inattention" certainly had consequences more serious that Shaquanda's implusive acting out. He was convicted of homicide and went home. Who did Shaquanda kill.

Paris, Texas must be a curious place indeed if the school system sends discipline cases to state prison rather than using other means. What do you do to people who fail to pay credit card debts--debtors prison?

You admit there is segregation in Paris--but it's "their" fault because they choose it. Segregation is about economics--look it up.

As for racism in Paris--me thinks Anonymous doth protest too much.

 
At 6:43 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

I too live in Paris. There is no explaining away what Judge Superville did. The 19 year old just happened to be a cousin of the sheriff. He KILLED two people. He had prior arrests. This was not the first time he was speeding in his big truck. He will most likely do it again since he only got a little slap on the wrist. It must be very hard on him to be sentenced to probation and having to send the Christmas cards every year to the dead childs family. Nothing is taken out of context. The fact that the school is able to persuade two of their black teachers to testify in no way indicates their was no racism. Althea Dixon was one of those teachers. I was at the trial. She testified that she had written the girl up twice. Once for wearing a skirt that she considered too short and once for the girl running out of a classroom crying when the teacher humiliated her and students were laughing. That writeup was for leaving the room without permission. Based on that, Mrs. Dixon recommended she be taken from her mother. Sounds like somone was trying to keep their job. The other black, Micheal Johnson testified that he had only met the mother once but he recommened TYC because the mother was unfit for filing complaints. I don't think Johnson is fit to determine who is a fit parent or not since he impregnated one of his students several years back but did not lose his job.Those were the only blacks testifying. Just because you have blacks trying to hold on to jobs that are very limited for blacks in Paris and are willing to do unethical things to keep them does not mean there is no racism. The only so called black leader that has "spoken out" saying that there is no racism in Paris Texas is Marva Joe. Every single time the issue of racism is brought up, they pull out that same old tired mouth piece. If they need an official black to say it, they pull out the FERPA man Robert High. These two are not leaders. They help keep racism alive. They serve the purpose of what just happened with this blog. "Since blacks participated, how could it be racism". Up until 1984, Paris still had segregated public housing. It was not because black people had a choice in the matter and wanted it that way. Stop making excuses for racism. Thats why Paris is in the spot light right now. They make too many excuses. They need to come off the plantation and step into this century.

 
At 3:37 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Mother,

I haven't spoken with a single person about this case that doesn't believe that the sentence was excessive, however it is also my understanding that Ms. Cotton could have been out of the Texas Youth Commission facility already had she not been denied a personal recognizance bond by an appeals court. My question (to which I do not know the answer) is why?

To be clear, I continue to believe that her sentence was harsh, especially since she had no criminal record (although she ahd an extensive disciplinary record at school).

There was no motive behind the lack of mention of a sentence for the 19 year old male. I didn't bring it up, because if I remember correctly, it was mentioned in the original article in the Chicago Tribune. I have no explanation as to why his sentence was reduced, but I also do not believe that he should have served jail time for a traffic accident in which he was not under the influence of any substances.

There are no debtors prisons, so we don't have that option (and I'm sure we're all thankful for that, regardless of our ethnicity).

I assign no fault or blame on anyone for the voluntary segregation that goes on in this nation. There are a multitude of reasons why people choose to live where they do. Economics is certainly one of them. In Paris, race has nothing to do with being poor. Roughly twenty percent of the population of Paris lives below the poverty line. That includes a great deal of whites and blacks. People also choose to live where they are comfortable. Undoubtedly racial composition plays a role in how comfortable some people (both black and white) are in their neighborhood. Personally, the skin color of my neighbors isn't one of the criteria I use to make decision as to where I live.

My only hope from this is that we can have an honest and open dialogue about the accusations that have been leveled against the city of Paris by a writer who chose to smear my city in an article about Ms. Cotton.

I believe that discussion such as this is the best way for us to kill racism. I sincerely hope that we can all agree to work towards that goal.

 
At 4:54 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Appellant judges are not in the business of releasing anyone directly after they have been incarcerated. It is no reflection on the girl. Students in Paris Independent School District are written up many times for things that make no sense. I read a Paris news article a while back that claimed an 8 year old boy with ADHD was sent to alternative school for rolling his eyes in the cafeteria and making noises. Kids with ADHD do those things so taking that into consideration,the fact that the girl who they said has ADHD,got numerus write-ups is not suprising. But no child should be placed in TYC because they got written up at school for minor things.I think people really need to look into matters when complaints are voiced concerning children and not look at race. Look at the Texas Youth Commission right now. Evidently Judge Superville claimed he had to send the girl to the Ron Jackson facility for her own best interest but now it has been proven that the little girls down there were being raped and abused by the guards and other staff. These chidren are the ones needing someone to speak up for them, not adults who make bad decisions.

 
At 6:57 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

In response to 6:43 PM Anonymous:

The only way we can honestly discuss these issues is to be precise. It is unethical to only use incidents taken out of context or muddled with ambiguity in order to advance your position.

The 19 year old male had one prior arrest for evading arrest by trying to flee from a patrolman pulling him over to issue a traffic citation. It is most likely the last time he will be speeding in his big truck, since part of his punishment prohibits him from driving such a vehicle. At his trial the he and the family of the deceased embraced and the family forgave him for the accident. The family of the deceased stated that they did not want him to serve time in jail. Perhaps that is what persuaded the judge to not issue the recommended sentence. It is abundantly clear that the incident was taken out of context.

You have no way of knowing what the motivation of Althea Dixon and Michael Johnson was in testifying against her. To pretend that you do is highly unethical.

Marva Joe is not a "so called black leader" in Paris. She is a leader in Paris who happens to be black. For you to disparage Marva Joe and Robert High, two upstanding community leaders, because they disagree with your position is unethical. Please explain how they keep racism alive.

I will not and have not made excuses for racism. I believe people should be judged by their words and actions, not by the color of their skin.

The following is to help illuminate the situation:

The Paris ISD Board consists of seven members, two of which are black. The black population of Paris is at roughly 22%. Blacks comprise roughly 28% of the school board.

The following link is to the Paris ISD Code of Conduct:

http://www.parisisd.net/InternetRoot/District/dmp%202005-06.pdf

Ms. Cotton was convicted of assault of a public servant, which is a third degree felony.

 
At 10:42 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

In response to the one person that is so painfully attempting to explain away a shocking show of racism in Paris Texas. The 19 year old KILLED two people. The D.A. did not request any time for this cousin of the sheriff. You claim you want all the facts stated. The JURY wanted him to serve five years. If it was such an innocent little accident as The Paris News keeps pretending it was, they would not have recommended that. Most likely, he would not have been charged at all. What I do know about Johnson and Dixon is what they testified to. Maybe Johnson feels obligated to do what he is told beause he got one of his students pregnant but was able to keep his job. You don't know what motivated them either, nor do you know what motivated the judge or the D.A. in the Cotton case, but you keep proclaiming that none of these things could possibly have been motivated by racism. Marva Joe must have followers in order to be a leader. The only reason the Paris News builds her up as a leader is beause she constantly bad mouths black people and claims Paris is free of racism. Who is she leading? The following is a link to a record of one of the incidents described in The Chicago Tribune Article. The article was done in 1998 and it showed the mindset in Paris Texas at that time and things have not changed since then. People should be judged by their words and actions. I could not agree more.

http://userdb.rootsweb.com/cemeteries/TX/Lamar/cgi-bin/txlamarcem.cgi?id=2261&d=Lamar_Co._TX_Cemeteries&r=http://userdb.rootsweb.com/cemeteries/TX/Lamar/&s=

 
At 8:55 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

I don't mind being the only person defending Paris' reputation. Someone has to stand up and speak out, just as you are compelled to speak out against the perceived injustice against Ms. Cotton.

My primary motivation is defending the reputation of my community.

As to the specific incident in question, I don't believe that we can definitively say one way or the other whether or not it was racism that motivated the sentence. The only way to truly know is to look inside the mind of Judge Superville. Since that isn't possible, all we can do is speculate as to the reason behind the severe sentence.

As to the traffic accident, it could have been you or I that caused that crash and killed those people. There would have been (and was not any) intent on our part. Traffic accidents, when the driver is not under the influence, should not result in jail time. I stand firm on that issue. Perhaps you missed the fact that the victims' family did not want him to spend any time in jail. That could have had something to do with the sentence. It was an innocent accident. Are you suggesting that he intended to kill two innocent people with his truck?

I most certainly have not proclaimed that none of the events in the Cotton case were not motivated by racism. I only suspect that they were not. I suspect the motivation had more to do with Ms. Cotton's consistent behavorial issues at school and the fact that she committed a felony. None of us can be certain as to anyone's motivation for their actions in this case. We can only suppose.

I tried to follow the link you provided, but it did not work. Could you please provide it again?

 
At 8:56 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

I meant to type there would not have been intent on our part in the discussion we're having about the crash. My apologies.

 
At 10:52 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Thats why Posey was charged with criminally negligent homicide rather than murder or manslaughter. Lets look at this realistically. You claim you want to show the real truth but when you posted Cody Posey's prior record, why did you only post one thing? You also proclaimed that most likey he would not be speeding again in his big truck. This is Cody Posys's criminal record with ALL incident included. I got it from the Lamar County records.

01/30/04-Fail To Stop (Stop Sign-Intersection)
01/30/04-Expired Driver'S License
01/23/04-Hunt Or Poss.Deer In Closed Area
09/14/04-Failure To Attend School
10/25/04-Failure To Attend School
11/20/04-Proof Of Financial Responsibility
12/13/04-Evading Arrest Detention W/Veh
01/19/05-Littering/Dumping
01/19/05-Permit Unlicensed Person To Drive
02/03/05-Failure To Attend School
Confined 05/25/2005 Released 05/25/2005
Charge CRIMINAL NEGLIGENT HOMICIDE
10/05/05-No Safety Belt
01/26/06-Speeding (Exceed Prima Facie Limit) - 58 Mph/45 Mph
01/26/06-Fail To Report Change Of Address On Dl
08/14/06-Fail To Report Change Of Address On Dl
11/13/06-Speeding (Exceed Prima Facie Limit) - 76 Mph/65 Mph
02/17/07-Speeding (Exceed Prima Facie Limit) - 74 Mph/60 Mph

Speaking of consistant behavorial issues.....
He has been caught speeding THREE times since he killed those people. Yet you sit and defend him. Sometimes things don't need defending. Maybe you should look within yourself to see what motivates you. The link is to the Lamar County Texas cemetery record of Irving Arthur. The Chicago Tribune did a story in 1998 and interviewed Parisians. Some of those interviews are in that record. The ignorance of some the people in Paris is mind boggling and it is made obvious in that article.

 
At 2:55 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

I apologize.

I too looked at the Lamar County records, but I only looked at the criminal records, hence the single listing. I stand corrected.

It's a damn shame that he has continued to speed on the road since the accident. I will not be defending him further, but I stand by the fact that he should not be in jail.

I have no ulterior motives. My motive is to defend the reputation of Paris.

I also have spoken with a friend of mine who is in law school regarding sentencing guidelines when a person is found guilty of assault on a public servant, which is a third degree felony.

VERNON'S TEXAS STATUTES AND CODES ANNOTATED
PENAL CODE
TITLE 3. PUNISHMENTS
CHAPTER 12. PUNISHMENTS
SUBCHAPTER C. ORDINARY FELONY PUNISHMENTS
§ 12.34. Third Degree Felony Punishment

(a) An individual adjudged guilty of a felony of the third degree shall be punished by imprisonment in the institutional division for any term of not more than 10 years or less than 2 years.

(b) In addition to imprisonment, an individual adjudged guilty of a felony of the third degree may be punished by a fine not to exceed $10,000.

 
At 5:39 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

That law applies to adults. It does not apply to juveniles. The max Supervile could have imposed was 7 years and that is what he did although he made it indeterminate. She got the same sentence juvenile rapists and murderers get unless they are tried as adults.

 
At 8:37 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

More insight as to why Ms. Cotton was given the sentence that she was:

Allan Hubbard, spokesperson for Lamar County (either DA or Court) said that during the trial Creola Cotton stated that neither she nor her daughter would follow any of the requirements of probation, because they felt that they had done nothing wrong.

 
At 11:06 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Not more insight. I know for a fact that is a lie and it can be proven. I was at the trial. If Hubbard, who works for the D.A., made such a statement, he is digging a hole for himself. They need to remember that a transcript exists.

 
At 12:01 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

I agree, if that is a lie, it will reflect very poorly on the DA's office. Why would he allow himself to be quoted by KXII if he was lying?

This is not to say that he is not lying, just that it would be very stupid on his part.

Is there any way to get ahold of a transcript so that we can know for sure?

 
At 9:16 AM, Blogger credo said...

This was an awesome exchange. And anonymous 10:52 you put the proof the pudding on the table and made Anonymous 2:55 eat crow.

How can you get on these blogs and accuse folks of lying and you don't have the facts?

Get the facts before defending those who have incarcarated a young female as a felon.

Shame on you 2:55 for even believing its okay for the young lady to spend one day in prison.

 
At 6:00 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Shame on you, credo, for believing that convicted felons shouldn't spend a day in jail.

I admittedly did not dig up criminal records as well as the person that I am having this discussion with, and readily admitted and apologized for my mistake.

It's funny that you mention that I should get my facts straight when 99% of the bloggers discussing this haven't bothered to.

I can assure you, that by and large, the only people who do have a clue about this case are the people of Paris. Most of the bloggers posting are not taking into consideration the fact that Ms. Cotton got herself in this predicament by her own actions. She could have already been released if not for her own actions. She would not be in TYC if not for her own actions.

It's good to know that accountability and responsibility for one's actions are no longer required. I could use a little extra cash. I think I'll go knock off a convenience store. Since I don't have a criminal record, even though a commit a felony, I should be given a slap on the wrist, right?

 
At 9:10 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

"Shame on you, credo, for believing that convicted felons shouldn't spend a day in jail."


Shame on you for believing its ok for the 14 year old to be in jail but you don't believe Cody Posey, A CONVICTED FELON, should spend a day in jail. You appear to be a hypocrite. According to Alan Hubbard, the girl has been kept there because she maintains her innocence.

 
At 10:56 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

You still haven't responded to the fact that the family of the deceased stated in court that they didn't think he should serve jail time.

I will say it again: if he was not under the influence of any narcotics or alcohol, or racing his car, he should not do time for a traffic accident.

I believe that is a dangerous precedent to set.

I do not believe that sentencing someone to time in a state facility for assaulting a public servant is setting a bad precedent.

Do you want to send the message to our kids that it's okay to assault public servants and authority figures? Apparently you do.

 
At 11:01 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

She clearly isn't innocent, because she clearly pushed the teacher's aide, which is assault on a public servant. Saying that you haven't committed a crime after you commit one is a good way to spend longer time in TYC than you should have to. If she would admit what she did was wrong and behave appropriately in TYC, she would have already been out. She obviously cannot do that.

She has clearly had a bad example set for her by her mother, which is a major contributing factor to her being in TYC instead of at home.

 
At 11:13 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Student sent to TYC for shoving aide

By Charles Richards
The Paris News Published March 12, 2006A 14-year-old girl has been sentenced to a state juvenile correction facility “for an indeterminate period not to exceed her 21st birthday” for shoving a 58-year-old teacher’s aide.The incident occurred Sept. 30 at Paris High School, while the aide was on hall monitor duty. The girl has a history of problems at school, according to court testimony.

County Judge Chuck Superville said the girl must spend a minimum of one year at a Texas Youth Commission facility. How much longer she will stay depends upon her progress, the judge said.

A three-man, three-woman jury listened to testimony Thursday and Friday before being handed the case about 3:30 p.m. Friday. The jury deliberated just 10 minutes before reporting it had a verdict: “We the jury find it true that the respondent … did engage in delinquent conduct by commission of an assault on a public servant as charged in the petition.”

Superville discharged the jury, and the trial moved into the punishment phase, which continued for about two and a half hours before defense attorney Wesley Newell and the Lamar County district attorney’s office rested about 6:15 p.m. Friday.

School officials said they have dealt with the girl, who is now a high school freshman, many times on disciplinary issues dating back several years.

Newell argued for probation, and Superville had gone on record that sending a teenager to the TYC was something he generally would do only as a last resort.

Prosecutors argued against probation, saying that the girl’s mother is perhaps her biggest problem and that the girl has no hope of getting better as long as she’s in the same home as her mother. District Attorney Gary Young said the mother’s response to any problem at school was to paint school officials as racist.

During the punishment phase, a half-dozen or so teachers — both white and black — from the high school or from Paris Alternative School, where the girl was transferred after the incident last September, described the girl as “openly defiant, generally did not follow rules.”

Michael Johnson, a teacher/coach at the alternative school, said after a teacher “wrote her up” for violation of rules, the girl told him “I’m going to bust her in the nose.” She wanted to go home, but he made her go to the office with him, Johnson said. He said she told him, “You don’t know me very well, because I’ll burn this school down.”

Johnson, who is black, said the girl’s mother berated him, calling him the equivalent of an Uncle Tom.

The jury had three women, one of whom was black, and three men.

PHS principal Gary Preston said the school district made available every resource it had “but regularly got road-blocked with non-support of her mother.” He said he knows of nothing more that can be done.

“I think (the girl) is capable, but she is enabled by a mother who won’t support the attempts to help her. … Up until now, I think it has been very harmful for her to be in the same home with her mother.”

The girl admitted pushing the teacher’s aide, Cleda Brownfield, but said she did so only after Brownfield shoved her first.

The Sept. 30 incident occurred about 15 to 20 minutes before regular classes were to begin at 8:30 a.m. at Paris High School. Brownfield was the hall monitor in a building where some students were having meetings and others were being helped by tutors.

The hall monitor’s job is to lock the doors about 8:05 a.m., keeping all other students out of the hallways until 8:30 a.m. to keep disruptions at a minimum. Brownfield said she was on her way to lock the door when the girl walked in. When the girl was told she couldn’t come in, she protested, saying she had to go to the restroom, Brownfield testified.

She told her she’d have to use a restroom in the cafeteria across the courtyard, and the girl finally left, she said. Minutes later, when another student was admitted into the building for a meeting, the girl insisted that she also be let in. When the girl told her, “I’ll knock your block off,” and moved to come in, Brownfield said, she put up her hands in a defensive posture, and the girl responded by shoving her hard.

A teacher, Jerry Fleming, was nearby and the girl complained that he had a pencil in his hand, causing a cut on her hand when he put out his hand to restrain her. He also stepped on her shoelaces, causing her to fall, and she bumped her head, she said.

School resource officer Brad Ruthart testified he was on duty in the parking lot when he was summoned to the building because Brownfield “had been assaulted by a student.” He said he found her in the lounge and the student seated outside the principal’s office.

Brownfield “was crying, very upset, holding her arm. I asked her if she was OK, and she said she was not. I felt she needed medical help. She was so upset she had difficulty talking,” said Ruthart, a Paris police officers who works as a school resource officer for PISD.

The girl “was very calm, didn’t appear to be a threat,” Ruthart testified. During the next half hour, he talked to the various teachers who were either involved or had seen part of what happened. He also talked to the girl and to several of her friends, all of whom insisted that Brownfield shoved first.

“I thought it didn’t seem like something Brownfield would do. From what I knew of her and from what others were saying, it didn’t add up,” he said. Ruthart said he had known the teacher’s aide for several years and described her as “mild-mannered, soft-spoken, a grandmotherly type.”

The girl’s mother testified late Thursday afternoon that she got dressed and drove to Paris High School after receiving a telephone call that her daughter had been involved in an incident.

“She was sitting in the office with two other girls, crying. She had a knot on her head and a cut on her hand,” she said.

She talked with Ruthart and Preston, she said.

“I was upset because my daughter was sitting there hurting, and nobody was doing anything to help her. I asked them why nothing had been done to treat her injuries,” she said.

Newell asked if she got any satisfaction from them.

“No, they could care less,” she said.

She took her daughter to the hospital emergency room, where she was treated for a contusion on her head, a laceration on her hand and a sprained neck, she said.

About an hour after the incident, Brownfield was removed from the school on a stretcher and was taken by ambulance to the hospital.

The girl’s mother said her daughter has Attention Deficit Hyperactive Disorder (ADHD) and was trying to get into the building that day so she could get medication from the school nurse.

Brownfield testified the girl made no mention of needing to see the nurse and that if she had, she would have been allowed to do so. Ruthart said the girl also said nothing to him about having wanted in the building to see the school nurse.

 
At 11:37 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Paris Texas Case Highlights Challenges Faced by Black Children Across the Country
Posted by Shawn Williams on March 22nd, 2007
I'm going to come address the situation in Paris from three different angles:

Broken Homes

Broken Schools

Broken Justice

Disclaimer: I do not know Shaquanda Cotton nor her mother Creola Cotton. I am a graduate of Paris High School and I have two nephews and a godson currently enrolled at Paris High School. I'm bringing my own perspective to the story from news reports and anecdotal conversations over the previous months.

Broken Homes

The case of Shaquanda Cotton has become bigger than any one individual, any one school, and any one town. As a matter of fact, the article of the Cotton family's plight was one of the most popular articles at digg.com yesterday. But individual lives are at stake, the lives of our children.

One of the challenges with cases like Ms. Cotton's is that trying to understand them from any one point of view diminishes their magnitude and scope, and often leads to misplaced energy. Racism in the schools is real; I'll deal with that tomorrow. Our justice system is unjust; that's for Monday. But today, I have to talk about the broken homes in the black community and our broken kids who we are sending to school.

There is not one school district in America that is designed to educate African-American children. While districts across the country try to figure out the best way to teach our new neighbors from the south, there has not been one attempt by our government in 400 years to fashion a curriculum that serves the unique needs of black youth. As such, if a child does not go to his first day of kindergarten understanding the importance of education and that school is only a place to learn (not play and socialize), chances are they will never get it.

Parents are getting younger and younger in our community. It's amazing how many high school graduates have parents who are 35 years old and younger. So in the most influential year of a child's life, years 1-5, many of our children are being raised by children. Not only that, but more than 40% of Black children live with a single mother compared to 20% of Hispanic children and 12 % of white children. Black fathers are often absent and children our missing a vital part of their development by not having a male present. Not that children can't succeed under those circumstances, but their success is the exception rather than the rule. This is not new information, but it speaks to the unique challenges many African-American children face when they walk through the school's door.

In my days in the Paris Independent School District, there were so many ways that our brokenness manifested itself in the classroom, in the hallways, and on the bus. I remember one of my good friends who when the teachers left the room would pass gas, get up and walk around fanning his stinky behind in the face of classmates. Or my boys high school who brought crack to school in empty 35 mm film cases.

And why do our kids fight so much? I can recount the many throwdowns that occurred on the bus after school let out. There were also fights in the hallway, many times between best friends. Young black girls were the worst when it came to fighting. Hair pulling, clothes tearing, face scratching, these girls got down for theirs. I don't recall once see two white females involved in a physical altercation during my school years.

And there is still a big problem with fighting in Paris Schools. But now it's not just the kids, but sometimes the mothers jump in and it's like a tag team match. There are also instances where hundreds of kids, black and white, congregate at the park in my old neighborhood and tape street brawls. The police are slow to intervene if they respond at all. None of what I mentioned is unique to Paris. Nor is sex in the schools. I was at church here in Dallas one day and kids ran over to tell us that a young lady at the high school across the street was giving boys oral sex for a dollar while they waited for the bus.

One of my nephews was getting in lots of trouble as a freshman at Paris High School. I met with one of his teachers, who was black, that outlined the discipline problems that she was having out of him in her class. One of the most frustrating parts of this problem was that he was able to do the work, but his behavior was too often getting in the way. Fortunately for him there was a family intervention, in the second half of his 9th grade year. The path that he was on had only two outcomes: death or jail. By the Grace of God he was able to get himself on the right track his sophomore year and he is scheduled to graduate this year. There was nothing that Paris High School did, or would have done for him more than call the police to come pick him up.

We as a community must have higher expectations of our children, demand more of ourselves as parents and mentors, and have a more realistic view of public schools. Schools are not designed to motivate our kids to learn or teach our children how to act. We have to have what Henry Louis Gates refers to as a " moral revolution." Gates actually says it like this: “Unless there is a moral revolution and a revolution in attitude among our people, unless [our kids] decide to stay in school, learn the ABCs, not to get pregnant when you’re 16, not to run drugs, not to sell drugs…we’re doomed to have a relatively small black middle class and huge underclass and never the twain shall meet."

In the end, our intolerance of poor behavior will have to equal our disdain for racism and injustice. We have to hold our parents to the same standards to which we hold our teachers and our administrators. A wise and seasoned sister that I heard speak at the Tavis Smiley meeting last month put it like this, "…No Child Left Behind sucks, but we are leaving our own children behind."

 
At 11:38 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

"I've lived here all my life, and I don't see that. My kids went to Paris High School, and they never had one minute of a problem with the school system, the courts or the police."

Mary Ann Fisher - Paris City Council/Mayor Pro Tem

 
At 12:07 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Superville: Look at all the facts

By Mary Madewell
The Paris News

Published March 25, 2007

County Judge Chuck Superville says he fears for the community’s safety and is calling for the national media and other organizations to investigate the facts before drawing conclusions about the Shaquanda Cotton case.

The judge said a March 12 story in The Chicago Tribune unfairly painted the community as racist and a recent protest as well as the threat of future protests by organized groups with national media coverage could “spin this thing out of control.”

Superville said he has refrained from commenting until now because of his position as the judge in the Cotton case, but that he believes he has a higher duty as county judge to maintain order in the community.

“I call on the media and others involved to go to the public record to get the facts of the case before they rush to judgment,” Superville said Saturday.

Superville said after a three-day jury trial, which found that Cotton committed an act of juvenile delinquency — namely assault causing bodily injury against a public servant — he determined the best place for her would be Texas Youth Commission.

“If Shaquanda had been white, the outcome would have been the same,” Superville said. “My decision was based on facts and law and I am confident this was the correct decision based on the facts I was presented.”

The March 2006 case is on appeal with the Texarkana Court of Appeals. The court conducted a 10-hour hearing in August 2006 to consider a request that Cotton be released on bond.

The judge said Cotton could have been released at that time but would not speculate why the appellate court did not grant the bond. The judge said he presented the facts of the case and that attorneys for both the prosecution and for Cotton presented arguments.

Superville said he gave the 14-year old an indeterminate sentence up to seven years — her 21st birthday.

“Once I set the indeterminate sentence, Shaquanda holds the key to her jail cell,” Superville said. “It is up to the child and TYC.”

In explaining the juvenile process, Superville said after a jury makes it’s finding, the judge determines the disposition.

“I am bound by law to ask lawyers whether or not reasonable effort has been made to prevent or eliminate the need for the child to be removed from her home,” Superville said.

“I also must determine whether or not there is enough family support to assist the child in successfully completing terms and conditions of probation,” Superville said.

“Thirdly, I must determine whether or not it is in the child’s best interest to be removed from the home,” the judge said.

“Both lawyers presented evidence on those points,” Superville explained. “The county attorney put on a substantial amount of evidence that Shaquanda had been a persistent behavior problem at school and that the mother failed to cooperate at every turn.”

“I asked if there was anything that could be done that had not already been done and the repeated answer was ‘no,’” Superville said.

Superville said reports from Lamar County Juvenile Probation Department also weighed on his decision. Before a juvenile trial which could result in probation, the probation department conducts a fact-finding survey.

“The juvenile officer said the mother refused to cooperate and said he had no reason to believe the mother would cooperate if Shaquanda received probation,” Superville said.

“That theme was repeated witness after witness—that the mother made it impossible to help Shaquanda,” Superville said. “She blamed everyone except the child for misbehavior.”

 
At 12:15 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Blog this: Nothing happened at Paris High

By Phillip Hamilton
The Paris News

Published March 25, 2007

Shaquanda Cotton was NOT sentenced to seven years in prison.

The 14-year-old, who was convicted of assaulting a public servant for shoving a 58-year-old teacher's aide, was sentenced to a state juvenile correction facility "for an indeterminate period not to exceed her 21st birthday." Whether she spends seven years in the dormitory-style facility she was assigned to depends on one person — Shaquanda.

Ever since the Chicago Tribune's Howard Whit did a hatchet job on Lamar County justice, folks across the nation have believed that County Judge Chuck Superville put Shaquanda behind bars for seven years. The fact is that's just plain and simple NOT true.

Let me repeat that for our recent out-of-town guests. The judge did NOT sentence Shaquanda to seven years and she is NOT in a prison.

By definition, an indeterminate sentence is one structured so that the person's conduct determines the date of release. The truth is that Shaquanda could be out by now. She determines how soon she comes home by her actions.

But that's not something the Chicago Tribune bothered to mention during the newspaper's journalistic lynching of this community earlier this month. Why lets facts get in the way of a good story, right?

The problem is that bloggers and talk-radio blabbers in the Metroplex and elsewhere have taken the spark the Chicago Tribune story started and fanned it into flames of outrage against our community. Now, other media are flocking to Paris to write about what one CNN producer told me last week is the "broader story" about how Shaquanda's case is affecting Paris.

Shaquanda's case isn't affecting Paris, but outside influences certainly are.

In the year after Shaquanda was convicted, absolutely nothing happened except Shaquanda's mother and a handful of wanna-be civil rights activists convinced a Dallas and Houston-based tabloid that Shaquanda had been wronged. The poorly written report was laced with inaccurate information and failed to garner much attention — especially with local African-Americans who are familiar with Shaquanda's case. Credible civil rights advocates, including most black ministers, did not become involved.

Then came Whitt and the Chicago Tribune with a much more polished version of the wanna-be civil rights activists' story. As spring break arrived, Blogs Gone Wild played on Web sites across the nation as wanna-be writers ate up Whitt's tale of a vindictive, racist school district and judicial system.

By Monday, ill-informed individuals marched on Lamar County Courthouse and PISD's administration building hurling insults at Superintendent Paul Trull and Assistant Superintendent Robert High, a real civil rights advocate who march with Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. in the '60s.

By Friday, the community had been whipped into a frenzy with rumors of protests and counter protests at Paris High, the plaza and the courthouse. Amid rumors that African-American students would walk away from classes at 11 a.m. and participate in a protest rally, law enforcement officers and school officials prepared for the worse. Extra lawmen were put on stand-by status and the front of Paris High was shielded with school buses. A white line was chalked to show protesters how far they could go without breaking the law.

Guess what happened?

Nothing — absolutely nothing.

Not one Paris High student walked away from campus, which was probably a great disappointment for the news vans parked across the street and the videographer aboard a chopper hovering over the school.

I know nothing happened because I had lunch in the Paris High cafeteria with Superintendent Paul Trull, PISD trustee George Fisher and a handful of African-America ministers.

Will there be another protest organized this week?

Probably.

But don't expect to see more than a handful of Paris residents participating. Those who know the facts understand Shaquanda's case is about the commission of a criminal act, not racism.

 
At 9:08 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Letters to the Editor
March 25, 2007

To the Editor:

I just saw the article regarding "Protesters March on PISD, etc." and my first reaction is, "You have got to be kidding?" This is 2007, not 1967, and didn't we learn anything from 40 years ago that public protest ends up causing more harm than good and changes nothing in the long run?

My second reaction is what is the disciplinary background of Shaquanda Cotton that one assault would trigger an indeterminate sentence from a county judge whose reputation is one of fairness and often, leniency?

Finally, I grew up in a large city and as an adult have had the opportunity to live in several different cities and towns throughout the United States. Paris is the only place where I have experienced the level of prejudice and racism aimed at almost anyone that is considered "non-black."

Mary J. Colbert

Paris



So what is everyones point? The fact that white people in Paris say the only victims of racism in Paris are the white people. This Colbert woman is claiming that peaceful protests are harmful and evidently she thinks Martin Luther King's protests did more harm than good. I live in Paris and no one told children to walk out of school. The school district helped spread rumors that the KKK and Black Panthers were going to meet in Paris and there was going to be a big old race war. The school had blockades, troopers, riot shields and helicopters flying around. All these rumors were started by children text messaging each other and gossiping. They wasted all that money and time based on a now obvious rumor. The school, the judge, the D.A. and Phillip Hamilton are making complete fools out of themselves right about now trying to attack the child in order to justify what they have done. Keep it up fellas. But I think its too late for a smear campaign to work.

 
At 10:34 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

NAACP reviews Cotton situation

By Mary Madewell
The Paris News

Published March 25, 2007

The Paris Branch of the NAACP called for a timely release of Shaquanda Cotton from the Texas Youth Commission after a four-hour executive committee meeting Saturday.

The group also asked that an emergency item be placed on Monday night’s Paris City Council agenda to consider naming a diversity task force.

The group also called for an expedited appeal of the Cotton case by the Texarkana Court of Appeals in motions approved unanimously by nine board members at Saturday’s meeting.


This is just a portion of the article in todays Paris News. Robert High is Vice President of the NAACP(at least he was a few weeks ago). They are calling for Cotton to be released. Looks like High has a conflict of interest. I don't know if he marched with Martin Luther King or not but I doubt it. He does not seem to have what it takes to be a civil rights leader. He an't fight for civil rights when he always claims there are never any civil rights violations or racism in Paris Schools. Maybe he means he was present when King was marching and he ran along side the group. I live in Paris and Robert High and Marva Joe are jokes in the black community. Now let me address Phillip Hamilton. He is notorious for the temper tantrums he throws in the newspaper when people don't vote or think the way he wants. There are two black people on the city council, Mary Ann Fisher and Kevin Gray. He built them up at one point but when they didn't vote the way he wanted them to in recent elections, his newsaper said they were not even intelligent enough to make such decisions. The Paris News should have the sense to report both sides of a story rather than just make one-sided personal judgements. Paris is now famous for three things, infamous lynchings, the school going over to Dallas and running around waving the Nazi Flag at a football game(It ended up on CNN and David Letterman and even though they apologized publicly, The Paris News said it was no big deal and was just blown out of proportion because of the "old jewish community" where the game was played and they reported that it wasn't racist because in Paris the school had "a black waving the flag and no one complained". Now Paris has the Shaquanda Cotton story. This has the makings of a good movie.

 
At 12:20 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Amazing.

NO ONE in Paris is claiming that whites are the only ones experiencing racism in Paris. To say that proves that you lack the ability to comprehend what you read (or that you are willing to lie about subject to advance your point of view).

To say that you doubt Robert High participated with Dr. King in civil rights protests seriously puts your credibility into question, as does not posting the whole article about the NAACP, because you've taken it out of context. They call for the timely release of Ms. Cotton after all of the facts of the case can be reviewed (which they state cannot happen yet).

Don't worry. I'll post the entire article here for you.

It's disgusting how willing you are to disparage any black member of the Paris community who doesn't label the judge, Paris ISD, the community, or anything else racist. You are so willing to disparage a person's character when they disagree with your point of view. What a shame.

Just FYI, the president of the Paris chapter of the NAACP, Dr. Joann Ondrovik, is white. The helicopter that was at Paris High was a news station, and not there because Paris ISD asked them to be there.

 
At 12:21 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

NAACP reviews Cotton situation

By Mary Madewell
The Paris News

Published March 25, 2007

The Paris Branch of the NAACP called for a timely release of Shaquanda Cotton from the Texas Youth Commission after a four-hour executive committee meeting Saturday.

The group also asked that an emergency item be placed on Monday night’s Paris City Council agenda to consider naming a diversity task force.

The group also called for an expedited appeal of the Cotton case by the Texarkana Court of Appeals in motions approved unanimously by nine board members at Saturday’s meeting.

Tensions have mounted here in recent days since a Chicago Tribune article appeared March 12 about the Cotton case.

Paris Mayor Richard Manning said late Saturday that he believes it “premature at this time to consider it.”

“I believe it is a good idea, but the council needs some time to make sure we can legally do this and then make sure we have the right people,” Manning said.

Following a three-day trial in March 2006, County Judge Chuck Superville gave Cotton an indeterminate sentence at Texas Youth Commission after a jury found that she committed assault causing bodily injury against a PISD teacher assistant.

On March 19, about 100 New Black Panther Party and Millions More Movement members and some Paris residents protested at Lamar County Courthouse and Paris Independent School District Administration Building.

NAACP president Joann Ondrovick said the group has spent more than 100 hours conducting court watch and witness interview on this case.

“The vote was unanimous after lengthy discussion and presentation of information gathered at the time of the trial and research the past week,” Ondrovick said of Saturday’s action.

Also by unanimous vote, the group made the following statement:

“The Paris Branch of the NAACP cannot proceed at the present time with the investigation into the matter of the Shaquanda Cotton case. There is critical confidential data, which has not been released and is necessary, under the NAACP protocol, in order to weigh the allegations of civil rights violations, prior to presenting a resolution.”

The statement continues: “These records are vital to a side-by-side comparison of data contained in the investigations from the Department of Education Civil Rights Division in order to reach any factual conclusions regarding discrimination or civil rights claims being advanced by Creola Cotton.”

Creola Cotton is the girl’s mother.

PISD was cleared of three earlier complaints by The Office for Civil Rights, but the district is still under investigation, according to Assistant Superintendent Robert High.

“They have come to the district and reviewed all records for a two-year period and conducted some interviews and are scheduled to return,” High said last week.

In making their appeal to Paris City Council, the Paris NAACP calls for “a Diversity Task Force (DTF), composed of 9-15 diverse and highly-motivated citizens to study, investigate and report on racism, prejudice and discrimination in the community.”

Issues to be studied include does racism exist and if so where and how is it expressed, according to a written statement. “What is the cause or history?” and “What means can be utilized to eliminate racism?” are questions proposed by the statement.

“The DTF should have a broad charge to investigate and collect data through hearings, town hall meetings, and any other means, then to regularly report the data in a useful manner, so as to work toward resolution of discrimination and racism in areas such as employment, housing, criminal justice, health and education,” the motion states.

“The DTF should process the data into strategies to solve the problems uncovered, and further provide leadership and encouragement to agencies and individuals to implement the strategies,” the statement concludes.

Members voting at Saturday’s meeting included Ondrovick, Thelma Dangerfield, Patsy Williams, Imogene Booker, Rexi Stamper, the Rev. C.H. Littlejohn, David Hamilton, Bob Bush and Rhonda Cobb.

 
At 8:34 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

We now know guards were raping and abusing the children in the facility where Superville sent the child yet he keeps on claiming he did the right thing in sending her there. Something is wrong with him.

 
At 12:59 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

How in the hell is it Superville's fault that there are abuses going on in TYC???????

I'd like to hear someone's opinion on the Shawn Williams article that I posted at 11:37 PM, since he's a black male that attended Paris High and currently has relatives in the PISD.

If you're having trouble comprehending what he has written, I'll help. He doesn't think the problem is Paris ISD. He thinks it's a parenting problem within the black community.

 
At 12:29 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Judge Chuck Superville now knows that TYC is full of sexual and physical abuse but he still maintains it is the best place for Shaquanda Cotton. If you aren't able to comprehend what is wrong with that picture, thats your problem. Black parenting problems are no different from whites. Only a racist idiot would believe good parenting is determined by color. There is a new story in the Chicago Tribune regarding Shaquanda Cotton. I'm sure it will throw Paris News editor into a racist frenzy as usual. He will probably spend the entire weekend clicking away at the keyboard trying to think up some clever(in his mind)jibberish to print in his Confederate newspaper in an effort to attack a child.The entire world is watching Paris Texas. If this Shawn Williams thinks his mama and daddy were not able to parent him because they were black, thats a problem he will have to work out within his own family.

 
At 11:10 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

You obviously did not read Shawn William's article at all. He had ZERO problems at school, and was voted best male student by the MOSTLY WHITE teachers at PISD.

I guess since he's black and thinks that there is a parenting problem in the black community, that he's racist against blacks. Or perhaps you can label him a "sell-out negro". From here on, I will assume that when you label someone who is black a sell-out, what you really mean to say is that they are objective. I suppose that you would label Dr. Bill Cosby as a "sell-out" as well. He speaks often to the same problems in the black community that Mr. Williams is referring to.

I believe the main problem that he is referring to is the fact that roughly 40% of black children are raised in single-parent homes, whereas roughly 12% of white children are raised in single-parent homes. I'm not sure if you were a math major in college (did you attend college?), but there is a statistically significant difference between 40% and 12%. He also mentioned the very young age at which many black women (who are still children themselves) are becoming pregnant and having babies. There is nothing racist about pointing out FACTS that present a problem in the black community, as Mr. Williams did in his article.

Your logic is so flawed on the TYC abuse issue. You believe that because abuses are occurring at TYC (and they are reprehensible) that all of the youthful offenders should be set free. That is absurd. The way to solve the problem is to find those individuals responsible for the abuses and prosecute them to the fullest extent of the law, not set felons free.

I am fully capable of comprehending that, but if you aren't, as you so eloquently put it, that's your problem.

I agree with you that black parenting problems are no different than white parenting problems, but I suspect there is a larger prevalence of parenting problems in the black community, simply by virtue of the fact that the vast majority of sixteen year old single mothers are ill-equipped to be parents.

So the Paris News is a Confederate newspaper? That's amusing. You are really hurting your credibility. And thanks to internet blogs like this one, the entire world is free to watch.

 
At 5:48 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

"Nearly 90 percent of juveniles incarcerated inside Texas youth prisons were sent there on indeterminate sentences that could run as long as their 21st birthdays".

--- Howard Witt, Chicago Tribune

It seems as though Ms. Cotton's sentence was pretty much the norm for youthful offenders.

That damn sure hurts your case, that she was treated unfairly, now doesn't it?

 
At 6:00 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Paris NAACP rep calls for task force

By Mary Madewell
The Paris News

Published March 27, 2007

The legal redress chairman of the Paris Branch of the NAACP asked Paris City Council Monday to form a diversity task force.

David Hamilton spoke during Citizens Forum at a meeting mainly devoted to interviewing city manager search teams and passing routine resolutions.

Hamilton asked council members to consider events surrounding the Shaquanda Cotton case as a separate matter from the request for a diversity task force.

“Her case is going to be decided either by the Texarkana Court of Appeals or by the Texas Youth Commission,” Hamilton said. “I expect that to happen very quickly.”

In relation to the Cotton case, Hamilton affirmed the NAACP chapter has acted consistent with its directives as “the voice of reason in this case.”

“Our directives are to get the facts or we don’t act,” Hamilton said. “Let me repeat — we get the facts or we don’t act.”

He said the local chapter has not authorized participation in any demonstration.

“The NAACP is 98 years old this year because it chooses to act and not to react,” Hamilton said. “We locals have spent over 100 hours of courtroom watch time and interviewing witness to ensure emotions and and opinions do not become facts.”

Hamilton reaffirmed the decision about the 15-year-old Paris student is in the hands of others outside the city.

“We in this room may not impact the appellate court; we may not impact the early release of that child from TYC, but we may make a difference in our city,” he said.

In appealing to council members, Hamilton said in his 20 years in the city he has found Paris to be “a proactive city.”

“We do things in this community because we know there is a need and not because someone comes in here and tells us we have to do it,” Hamilton said.

“We have citizens here who need to be heard,” Hamilton emphasized. “We have citizens who are wonderfully skilled at listening and who are wonderfully skilled at gathering information and who can communicate.”

Hamilton asked the council to consider using NAACP members as part of a diversity task force.

“Our request is that you recognize these needs and these skills and use our unique and varied talents to establish a diversity task force,” Hamilton said.

The speaker expressed confidence in the council.

“I know this council has demonstrated leadership in the past — it has come together,” Hamilton said. “We are asking that you demonstrate leadership again in the future. This is not a new thing — other cities have done it.”

In closing, Hamilton repeated the words of Dr. Martin Luther King Jr.

“We must learn to live together as brothers and sisters or surely we will perish as fools.”

 
At 8:50 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Anyone who wants the most complete description of the events that occurred with Ms. Cotton, please listen to the interview that Allan Hubbard gave on blogtalkradio.com.

Here is the link:

http://www.blogtalkradio.com/hostpage.aspx?show_id=17780

The title of the segment is Shaquanda Cotton Part 3, and Allan Hubbard is listed in the description.

 
At 9:26 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Article on The Drudge Report:

Uproar Over Texas Teen's Imprisonment


Email this Story

Mar 27, 9:20 PM (ET)

By PAUL J. WEBER
Google sponsored links
Work at Home- Make $25/hr - You can earn a living from home. Start Today, No Experience Needed!
Paid-Work-at-Home.com

Army Paralegals - Apply for Paralegal Positions in the U.S. Army JAG Corps
www.GoArmy.com/JAG







DALLAS (AP) - A teenager has been jailed for more than a year for shoving a teacher's aide at her high school, a case that has sparked anger and heightened racial tensions in rural East Texas.

Shaquandra Cotton, who is black, claims the teacher's aide pushed her first and would not let her enter school before the morning bell in 2005. A jury convicted the 15-year-old girl in March 2006 on a felony count of shoving a public servant, who was not seriously injured.

The girl is in the Ron Jackson Correctional Complex in Brownwood, about 300 miles from her home in Paris. The facility is part of an embattled juvenile system that is the subject of state and federal investigations into allegations that staff members physically and sexually abused inmates.

Under the sentence handed down by Lamar County Judge Chuck Superville, she will remain at the facility until she meets state rehabilitation standards or reaches her 21st birthday.

But her family and civil rights activists say they want her home now. They are condemning the sentence as unusually harsh and say it shows a justice system that punishes young offenders differently, depending on their race.

Creola Cotton, Shaquandra's mother, and activists argue that while Superville sent Shaquandra to the state's juvenile prison system, he gave a white 14-year-old arsonist probation.

As many as 400 people marched and rallied in Paris on Tuesday, the second such protest in as many weeks by civil rights groups.

Meanwhile, the Paris school district fiercely denied claims of racism and chided the girl's mother for "playing a game" to start controversy.

Creola Cotton says her daughter received an unjust punishment for pushing the Paris High School employee. Her complaints have prompted federal civil rights investigations into the school district.

"My daughter has been (at Brownwood) a year now," Creola Cotton said. "It's time for her to come home."

In an interview with The Paris News, Superville said he chose the sentence because witnesses testified that placing Shaquandra back in her mother's care was not the best decision.

"If Shaquandra had been white, the outcome would have been the same," Superville said. "My decision was based on facts and law, and I am confident this was the correct decision based on the facts I was presented."

About 41 percent of students are black in Paris, a city of about 26,000 just south of the Oklahoma border. Fewer than 10 percent of the district's teachers are black, according to the most recent audit by the Texas Education Agency.

Dennis Eichelbaum, an attorney for the Paris school district, said the U.S. Department of Education's Office for Civil Rights has vindicated the district by finding no evidence of discrimination in three cases. Five other investigations remain open.

Creola Cotton is preventing the district from fairly defending itself by refusing to let the school district make her daughter's entire record public, Eichelbaum said.

"Mrs. Cotton has been wrongfully attacking the character of the district," Eichelbaum said. "She's being disingenuous with regard to her daughter being an innocent child."

Added Eichelbaum: "She's playing a game."

Prosecutors say they offered Shaquandra a plea agreement that would have reduced the felony charge to a misdemeanor and given her two years' probation. But Creola Cotton rejected the plea on behalf of her daughter, prosecutors said.

A spokesman for the U.S. Department of Education said the agency handled nearly 1,000 discrimination complaints last year.

 
At 10:17 AM, Blogger Qusan said...

It seems as though Ms. Cotton's sentence was pretty much the norm for youthful offenders.

That damn sure hurts your case, that she was treated unfairly, now doesn't it?


This assumes everyone who gets tried, gets convicted. The arsonist child should have gotten sent to jail until she was 21. The reckless driver with a lengthly record should be under the jail.

 
At 10:43 AM, Blogger Cobb said...

Don't any of you people have names?

 
At 2:46 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

"This assumes everyone who gets tried, gets convicted".

No, I was strictly referring to sentences.

The bottom line is the only reason that Ms. Cotton was on trial is because she assaulted an employee of the school, and the only reason she is in TYC instead of at home on informal probation (like the judge offered) is because her mother refused the offer.

 
At 10:58 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

FACT: This juvenile girl assaulted a teacher, who by Texas law is a public servant, in September 2005. It was witnessed first-hand by two other teachers who testified.

FACT: Before trial, the Lamar County and District Attorney's Office (prosecutors) offered a plea bargain reduction from felony to misdemeanor assault and 2 years juvenile probation, which the mother and defense attorney turned down.

FACT: The juvenile had a trial and was found adjudicated delinquent by a jury (we don't refer to juveniles as "guilty" or "not guilty" in Texas - it's "adjudicated" or "not adjudicated") in March of 2006.

FACT: After the jury adjudicated the juvenile as delinquent, the defense asked Lamar County Judge Chuck Superville to set punishment. The defense could have had a jury set punishment, but asked for the judge to decide.

FACT: This juvenile did NOT receive 7 years in prison. She was given an indeterminate sentence to the Texas Youth Commission, which means her conduct and cooperation with their behavior rehabilitation programs determines when she gets out. Minimum time to complete those programs is 9 months. She entered TYC in March 2006 and could have been out in December 2006 if she was being cooperative. But note that she never had to go to TYC in the first place: she could have gotten probation.

FACT: Texas statute under the Family Code (governing juveniles) left 2 options for the judge: 1) release the juvenile on probation back to a family member who verbally assures the judge that cooperative efforts to meet probation conditions will be met, and 2) sentence to the Texas Youth Commission. Often, parents are part of the problem and other family members step forward to offer to take the juvenile in their care and see to it probation conditions are met. NO other family members came forward and this juvenile's mother (Creola Cotton) told the judge she would not comply with conditions of probation. The judge's hands were tied by the law and he had no other choice but TYC.

FACT: School officials testified during the punishment phase that this juvenile had been a continuous discipline problem and that her mother continually defended her actions, telling her she did nothing wrong, and fought against disciplinary actions against her daughter for legitimate infractions.

FACT: The defense filed an appeal, fired the defense attorney trial attorney they hired (Wesley Newell of Dallas) and alleged ineffective assistance of counsel (saying the defense attorney didn't do his job well enough). The Court of Appeals in Texarkana ruled that the juvenile would not be released on bond pending their final appeal decision. That decision has not yet been handed down.

FACT: This juvenile would not be in TYC if her mother had agreed to cooperate with conditions of probation after the jury found her essentially guilty.

You will find these facts with additional comments at http://www.lamarcountyattorney.com/cotton.html

 

Post a Comment

<< Home

Criminals Moving HQ To Dubai

Well isn't this a kick in the head and a slap in the face.

U.S. oil services firm Halliburton Co. is moving its headquarters and chief executive to Dubai in a move that immediately sparked criticism from some U.S. politicians.

Texas-based Halliburton, which was led by Vice President Dick Cheney from 1995-2000, did not specify what, if any, tax implications the move might entail. It plans to list on a stock exchange in the Middle East once it moves to Dubai — a booming commercial center in the Gulf. The company said it was making the moves to position itself better to gain contracts in the oil-rich Middle East.

“This is an insult to the U.S. soldiers and taxpayers who paid the tab for their no-bid contracts and endured their overcharges for all these years,” said judiciary committee chairman Sen. Patrick Leahy, a Vermont Democrat.

0 Comments:

Post a Comment

<< Home

He Be Concubining?

This is downright ignorant and SAD!

Ricky Lackey has six children on the way.

Don't call them sextuplets - they're each with different women.

When Hamilton County Common Pleas Judge Melba Marsh asked Lackey during sentencing Friday on a charge of attempted theft how many children he had, the 25-year-old said, "None, but I have six on the way."

A stunned Marsh tried to clarify. "Are you marrying a woman with six children?" she asked.

"No, I be concubining," he said.

Prosecutors said Lackey is the expectant father of six children with six different women. The women all are expected to deliver in August, September and October.

Lackey's lawyer, Stephen Wenke, stopped his client from saying more.

Marsh said she wasn't sure how to respond, so she let the issue drop since it wasn't relevant to the proceedings.

1 Comments:

At 12:56 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

I read this with one of those screwed up faces. People should not use words that they do not know the meanings of!

 

Post a Comment

<< Home

Sunday, March 11, 2007

I Should Be Ashamed To Admit This

But the thought of this chick's leg coming off or having a malfunction did cross my mind. I'm not sick enough to actually bet on it, though.

If Heather Mills' leg should happen to fall off during this season of "Dancing With the Stars," it will surely be a YouTube classic -- and could also make a few lucky gamblers some cold hard cash.

Yes, you can actually bet on whether or not Heather's prosthetic leg will fly off during a routine on the popular ABC show. If you bet $100 that it does happen, the gambling website Bodog.com will pay out $350. On the other hand, you would need to bet $600 that it doesn't happen to win $100. For all you gambling noobs, that makes "no" the heavy favorite.

The site even goes as far as to state, "Heather Mills' leg must fall off, not be purposely taken off, during a dance routine for all Yes wagers to be graded a Win." Just remember, kids: Gambling is bad!

Reminder: If you laugh, you are going to hell with me.

0 Comments:

Post a Comment

<< Home

Friday, March 09, 2007

China: I Know You Are But What Am I?

There is not a place in the world that George W. Bush can go and speak on Democracy, human rights or any of the lofty ideals that the United States is supposed to espouse. Barring slavery, what this administration has done in Iraq and on behalf of the neo-ideology has left a deep dark stain on our flag.
Responding to U.S. complaints, China charged Thursday that the Bush administration has no standing to criticize other countries on human rights because its own record is full of blemishes at home and abroad.

The Chinese accusation, in a retort to the State Department's annual human rights report issued Tuesday, called particular attention to what it said were abuses committed by U.S. soldiers and intelligence agents in Afghanistan and Iraq and at the prison at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba. The Chinese also underlined what they described as increased willingness by Washington to spy on its own citizens by monitoring telephone calls, computer connections and travels.

"As in previous years, the State Department pointed the finger at human rights conditions in more than 190 countries and regions, including China, but avoided touching on the human rights situation in the United States," the government said in a report issued by Premier Wen Jiabao's office. "We urge the U.S. government to acknowledge its own human rights problems and stop interfering in other countries' internal affairs under the pretext of human rights."

The Chinese response to U.S. human rights concerns has become a fixture over the last eight years. In the first years, it centered on Beijing's contention that human rights should be defined to include social and economic improvements, such as health care and education, where the Chinese government can point to rapid progress. These arguments were raised again this year, with charges that racial minorities, women and children suffer disadvantages in the United States.

But more recently, the tone of the response has sharpened to reflect increasing reports of U.S. abuses against foreigners suspected of connections to terrorism. These include accusations of kidnapping, torture and imprisonment without legal recourse -- the same abuses often raised by the United States with Chinese authorities.

The latest U.S. official to raise human rights concerns in Beijing was Deputy Secretary of State John D. Negroponte, who visited here over the weekend. In his last job, as President Bush's intelligence coordinator, Negroponte oversaw the Central Intelligence Agency, whose employees are heavily involved in the detentions and interrogations that have come under sharp criticism from human rights organizations. The Chinese government raised similar criticisms in its report.

"The United States has a flagrant record of violating the Geneva Convention in systematically abusing prisoners during the Iraqi War and the War in Afghanistan," it said, adding later: "A Human Rights Watch report in July 2006 said torture and other abuses against detainees in U.S. custody in Iraq were authorized and routine."

0 Comments:

Post a Comment

<< Home

Thursday, March 08, 2007

Promising Democracy, Imposing Theocracy

Today, on International Woman's Day, let's ponder what our invasion into Iraq has done for the women there:

Amidst the chaos and violence of US-occupied Iraq, the significance of widespread gender-based violence has been largely overlooked. Yet, Iraqi women are enduring unprecedented levels of assault in the public sphere, "honor killings," torture in detention, and other forms of gender-based violence. Women are not only being targeted because they are members of the civilian population. Women—in particular those who are perceived to pose a challenge to the political project of their attackers—have increasingly been targeted because they are women. This report documents the use of gender-based violence by Iraqi Islamists, brought to power by the US overthrow of Iraq's secular Ba'ath regime, and highlights the role of the United States in fomenting the human rights crisis confronting Iraqi women today. Some key points include:

Imposing Theocracy through Gender-Based Violence

Under US occupation, Iraqi women have endured a wave of gender-based violence, including widespread abductions, public beatings, death threats, sexual assaults, "honor killings," domestic abuse, torture in detention, beheadings, shootings, and public hangings. Much of this violence is systematic—directed by the Islamist militias that mushroomed across Iraq after the US toppled the mostly secular Ba'ath regime.

Like religious fundamentalists in the US and elsewhere, Iraq's Islamists see the subordination of women as a top priority—both a microcosm and a precondition of the social order they wish to establish. As in Iran, Algeria, and Afghanistan, a campaign of violence against women was the first salvo in the Islamists' war to establish a theocracy in Iraq.

First They Came for the Women

Attacks on women began within weeks of the US invasion in 2003. US authorities did nothing to stop the violence, and soon the attacks spread. Within a year, Islamists were killing Iraqi artists, intellectuals, professionals, ethnic and religious minorities, lesbians and gays—indeed, anyone whom the Islamists perceived as a threat to their agenda. Women, who are seen as the carriers of group identity, have remained in the cross-hairs of Iraq's warring sectarian militias. Iraqi women's organizations report that militias "are taking revenge on each other by raping women," and targeting Christian women with rape and assassination as part of a broader attack on that community.

0 Comments:

Post a Comment

<< Home

Fora Bush!


That means GO HOME! But, heck, we don't want him here either. What does Bush not get about the entire world hating him?
President George Bush last night started a five-nation tour of Latin America in an effort to salvage Washington's reputation in the region and counter the influence of Venezuela's president, Hugo Chávez.

Violent clashes were taking place between police and masked protesters in the financial centre of Sao Paulo, the president's first stop. Rioters threw rocks at police who answered with rubber bullets and tear gas bombs. Bystanders fled the smoke-filled streets outside the art museum as running battles erupted. Several loud explosions shook the area.

Earlier protesters in Brazil signalled widespread hostility to the US leader by briefly shutting down an iron mine, invading an ethanol distillery, occupying a bank and unfurling a banner in parliament.

A massive security effort will mobilise about 4,000 police officers and soldiers as Mr Bush's cavalcade of 60 vehicles drives through the sprawling metropolis.

Further protests will be led by Mr Chávez, who is scheduled to address a rally at a stadium in Buenos Aires, the Argentinian capital, just 30 miles from a ranch in Uruguay where Mr Bush is due to meet Uruguay's president, Tabaré Vázquez.

The six-day tour is a belated response to the region's "pink tide" of leftwing governments and US Democrats' accusations that Mr Bush has "lost" Latin America.

Anger over the Iraq war and rows about trade and immigration have eroded US authority in what it once considered its backyard, giving Mr Chávez a clear run to use bulging oil revenues to court support for his brand of socialism.

0 Comments:

Post a Comment

<< Home

Fetus Freaks Want To Rid The Womb of Homos

I just don't know when anti-homosexuality became a cornerstone of Christianity. Seriously, it never came up throughout my parochial education and it seems as though it has turned into a burning issue over the past decade. Now these fetus freaks want to go into the womb to alter genes if, as suspected and almost prove, homosexuality is proven to be a natural occurrence. If it were any other "ailment," they'd be afraid of risking the life of the baby. But, this is okay?
"The president of a prominent Southern Baptist seminary says he would support medical treatment, if it were available, to change the sexual orientation of a fetus inside its mother's womb from homosexual to heterosexual.

The idea was floated by the Rev. R. Albert Mohler Jr., president of Southern Baptist Theological Seminary in Louisville, Ky., on his blog, www.almohler.com, last Friday (March 2).

'If a biological basis is found, and if a prenatal test is then developed, and if a successful treatment to reverse the sexual orientation to heterosexual is ever developed, we would support its use as we should unapologetically support the use of any appropriate means to avoid sexual temptation and the inevitable effects of sin,' Mohler wrote in advice for Christians.

Mohler's view, in some ways, could signal a shift away from traditional evangelical thinking on homosexuality, from a condition that is changeable to one that is actually determined by genetics. Mohler said there is 'no incontovertible or widely accepted proof' that sexual orientation is based in biology, yet 'the direction of the research points in this direction.'"

When all of the hungry people in the world are fed, all of the cold and homeless are clothed and sheltered, all of the sick people are healed and there is peace on earth, this would still not be an issue that Jesus Christ would be concerned with.

1 Comments:

At 6:11 AM, Anonymous P6 said...

Mohler said there is 'no incontovertible or widely accepted proof' that sexual orientation is based in biology, yet 'the direction of the research points in this direction.'"

So...if it's a natural phenomenon this guy is willing to undo God's will.

 

Post a Comment

<< Home

Witch Trials Revisited

Lynch mobs are still burning witches

Her fingernails, makeup and clothing apparently made her look like a witch in the eyes of the principal at the Hampton Bays school where she taught reading, Lauren Berrios said yesterday as she prepared for her lawsuit against the district to go to trial.

Berrios, 37, who vehemently denies ever practicing witchcraft, said there was no reason her appearance at the school could have been mistaken for anything other than a prim and well-kept professional.

Jurors in federal court are scheduled to start hearing today about how Berrios endured harassment from former Hampton Bays Elementary School principal Andrew Albano, who she claims falsely accused her of being a witch.

She sat in her lawyer John Ray's Miller Place office yesterday and recounted how rumors of witchcraft had led to her being denied tenure and eventually fired from the district.

Hired in 1999, Berrios was a reading specialist at the school. During her second year there, she said, she began to hear from parents that rumors were spreading that she was a witch.

Then, she said, Albano began removing books from her classroom, such as Shakespeare's plays and the Goosebumps series, which Berrios says he disliked because they involve goblins, soothsayers and ghosts. Berrios said the paranormal went against Albano's born-again Christian beliefs.

There were other genres in Berrios' library, she said. "I'm a reading specialist, I use literature."

0 Comments:

Post a Comment

<< Home

Taliban Says Bring It!

We've been there how long and the Taliban is ready to come back full force? We are just chasing our tail over there.

"A top Taliban commander said Wednesday the group has 4,000 fighters bracing to rebuff NATO's largest-ever offensive in northern Afghanistan, now in its second day. Suicide bombers are ready, land mines have been planted and helicopters will be targeted, Mullah Abdul Qassim, the top Taliban commander in Helmand province told The Associated Press.

NATO, meanwhile, announced the capture of a senior Taliban fighter who had eluded authorities by wearing a woman's burqa. Mullah Mahmood, who is accused of helping Taliban fighters rig suicide bomb attacks, was seized by Afghan soldiers at a checkpoint near Kandahar, the alliance said.

Speaking by satellite telephone from an undisclosed location, Qassim said the Taliban has 8,000 to 9,000 fighters in Helmand province, including some 4,000 in the north, where NATO launched its largest-ever offensive Tuesday. He said all the fighters were Afghan, denying reports of hundreds of foreign fighters in the region.

'All of them are well-equipped and we have the weapons to target helicopters,' Qassim said. 'The Taliban are able to fight for 15 or 20 years against NATO and the Americans.'"

0 Comments:

Post a Comment

<< Home

This Does Not Constitute A Couple

Call me a prude but I still this there is something wrong with this. It's just nasty!
Straight from the scary fairy tales of once-upon-an-adoption comes the story of Patrick Stuebing and Susan Karolewski, a brother and sister, who fell in love, had four children and now are fighting the German courts to overthrow its brother-sister incest law. As reported Wednesday by the BBC, the couple describe themselves as a "normal couple" who just want to have a family and live without discrimination. Stuebing already spent two years in jail for committing incest, and he'll get thrown back into jail for another sentence if the current incest law stands. Three of the couple's four children have been taken into foster care.

Now, maybe I'm becoming a reactionary scold in my approaching dotage, but the couple's relationship doesn't sound terribly normal, nor even, perhaps, consensual. According to the article, Stuebing, who had been adopted by another family, found his biological family at the age of 23, when Karolewski was 15. After their mother died six months later, the couple fell in love and began living together and popping out babies at a prodigious rate of four in six years. OK, vive la différence and all, but people! That's a 16-year-old living with her 24-year-old brother and pregnant most of the time. Ech.

But it's not as if they don't have a case. Incest laws around the world vary widely, though the practice is illegal in most countries. In Germany, sex with a relative still constitutes a criminal offense, punishable by up to three years in prison. But in neighboring France, Napoleon abolished incest laws in 1810, and recently Japan, Argentina and Brazil legalized it. The United States still criminalizes incest and many states still outlaw kissin'-cousin incest as well.

So a long lost brother put the moves on his baby sister and folks wanna call it a love affair and not statutory rape. This is some nasty isht!

0 Comments:

Post a Comment

<< Home

Punishing The Mother

I am so sick of hearing these stories where men cannot handle a divorce and decide to kill the children in a violent manner.
Before Eric Johnson flew his rented Cessna into his former mother-in-law's house, killing himself and his passenger, his 8-year-old daughter, Emily, he told his ex-wife in a final call, "I've got her and you're not going to get her."

The last cell phone call came Monday morning, a family member said, before the flight ended in an act of seeming deadly vengeance against Johnson's ex-wife, whom he had bitterly divorced last fall.

"Mommy, come get me, come get me," Emily could be heard screaming in the background, according to Johnson's former mother-in-law, Vivian Pace.

The white single-engine plane brushed treetops and shook a swing set on which Emily once played before it skipped and slammed into a bedroom wall of the hillside house. Inside, Pace was sure a bomb had hit.

She later learned that tangled in the wreckage were the bodies of her granddaughter-- described by teachers as "a dear little girl"--and her former son-in-law, a man she said was bent on getting revenge on his ex-wife, Beth Johnson.

"He was a very possessive person," Pace told reporters outside the house Tuesday morning. "That was the way he could hurt Beth. ... He got what he wanted."

Investigators in this small southern Indiana town are trying to piece together what they believe was a bizarre act of postdivorce rage that ended in murder-suicide. But what was truly in Johnson's mind--and why he apparently decided to take his daughter with him to their deaths--remains a mystery.

1 Comments:

At 6:41 AM, Blogger J said...

Amen to that one! Definitely a International Women's Day goal to add to the list.

Jamison.

 

Post a Comment

<< Home

Tuesday, March 06, 2007

Peeling Away Backwardness One Fatwa At A Time

Now this is promising.

This is the best bit of news I've come across in a while: Egyptian Grand Mufti Aly Gomaa issued a fatwa declaring it religiously acceptable for a woman to have her hymen surgically reconstructed, according to the Daily Star Egypt. On the surface that might not seem grounds for celebration, but consider that in certain regions, an unmarried woman who loses her virginity might very well become the target of an "honor killing." Even better, though, is that Gomaa scoffed at the idea of considering a torn hymen as evidence that a woman has lost her virginity: "It is not rational for us to think that God has placed a sign to indicate the virginity of women without having a similar sign to indicate the virginity of men."

Apparently, Gomaa's fatwa has set off a firestorm throughout Egypt. But he isn't without legitimate supporters. Sheikh Khaled El Gindy, a member of the Higher Council of Islamic Studies, backed Gomaa's stance (with a little added sass): "Any man who is concerned about his prospective wife's hymen should first provide a proof that he himself is virgin." Then, when a reporter asked El Gindy about the sanctity of a woman's virginity, he responded: "Islam does not care for the feelings of ignorant people, just as the law does not protect the idiots." Love it!

A blogger on Eteraz.org clearly spells out why this should be considered a triumph for Muslim women's rights: "What is remarkable about this fatwa is that while it accepts the underground hymen-surgery racket, it does not endorse it; it considers the practice acceptable only because it protects a woman from potential violence. The real meat of the fatwa is in its de-emphasis of the need for proof of virginity -- and in a region of the world where a woman is not considered a virgin unless she bleeds on her wedding night, this is a serious blow to entrenched un-Islamic misogynistic cultural practices."

0 Comments:

Post a Comment

<< Home

The Purge Continues

The White House is full of crooks and liars for certain. Otherwise there would be no need for this type of madness.

The former federal prosecutor in Maryland said Monday that he was forced out in early 2005 because of political pressure stemming from public corruption investigations involving associates of the state’s governor, a Republican.

“There was direct pressure not to pursue these investigations,” said the former prosecutor, Thomas M. DiBiagio. “The practical impact was to intimidate my office and shut down the investigations.”

Mr. DiBiagio, a controversial figure who clashed with a number of Maryland politicians, had never publicly discussed the reasons behind his departure. But he agreed to an interview with The New York Times because he said he was concerned about what he saw as similarities with the recent firings of eight United States attorneys.

As in those cases, there are conflicting accounts of the circumstances that led to Mr. DiBiagio’s ouster. The Justice Department disputes his version.

The truth will come out in the end. It's only a matter of time.

0 Comments:

Post a Comment

<< Home

The Pardon Cometh

Why bother celebrating?

After deliberating 10 days, a federal jury Tuesday found I. Lewis "Scooter" Libby, former aide to Vice President Dick Cheney, guilty on four of five counts in his perjury and obstruction of justice trial.

Libby was convicted of:

# obstruction of justice when he intentionally deceived a grand jury investigating the outing of CIA operative Valerie Plame;

# making a false statement by intentionally lying to FBI agents about a conversation with NBC newsman Tim Russert;

# perjury when he lied in court about his conversation with Russert;

# a second count of perjury when he lied in court about conversations with other reporters.

Jurors cleared Libby of a second count of making a false statement relating to a conversation he had with writer Matt Cooper, formerly of Time magazine.

Libby, 56, faces a maximum sentence of 25 years in prison and a fine of $1 million. A hearing on a presentencing report is scheduled for June 5.

CNN legal analyst Jeffrey Toobin said, "He is virtually certain to go to prison if this conviction is upheld."

0 Comments:

Post a Comment

<< Home

All That Glitters ...

Who Dates These Clowns?

We wondered how long it would take for NBA baller and wanna-be rapper, Ron Artest to find himself immersed in drama. Quite frankly it took longer than we thought. That said, the Sacramento Kings NBA basketball team has indefinitely excused Artest from the team after his arrest Monday morning on domestic violence charges.

Artest, the team's star forward , who was banned for almost all of the 2004-05 season for his involvement in a brawl with fans, hasn't been suspended and will continue to be paid as team officials investigate the incident. He is the Kings' second-leading scorer, averaging 18.7 points a game.

Police arrested Artest, 27, at his home in Loomis, California, after authorities received a 911 call from a woman who said she was assaulted. He was charged with domestic violence and the use of force to prevent a victim from reporting a crime, the Placer County Sheriff's Department said in a press release. The woman wasn't identified.

Authorities released Artest from the Placer County jail after he posted $50,000 bail, police spokeswoman Dena Erwin said. He's scheduled to be arraigned on March 22.

"The Kings have excused Ron Artest indefinitely from any further participation with the team due to his arrest today," Geoff Petrie, Kings president of basketball operations, said in a statement. "The Kings will continue to accumulate reliable and official facts and information over the next several days before taking any further action."

0 Comments:

Post a Comment

<< Home

Enough Already!

Lest I be accused of gay bashing myself, how can a woman with an Adam's apple consistently and predictably make gay slurs?
And in today's issue of "What was [she or he] thinking?" we have conservative pundit Ann Coulter demonstrating that she has no sense of decency by her use of a gay slur describing presidential candidate John Edwards.

Her callous disrespect for both Edwards and gays is telling of her inability to espouse the Christian ideals that she regularly attempts to trumpet as convervative values.

Speaking at the Conservative Political Action Conference, Coulter said: "I was going to have a few comments on the other Democratic presidential candidate, John Edwards, but it turns out you have to go into rehab if you use the word 'faggot.'"

At that point, the audience gave out a collective "Ohhh" and then started to cheer, to which Coulture continued, "Kind of an impasse, can't really talk about Edwards."

So why use such a disparaging term for anyone? Is it impossible to debate Edwards on the merits of his political positions? Why use such a pejorative term?

It's because Coulter is filled with hate and disdain for people unlike her. Such a hateful outlook on people who are different being spoken from a bully pulplit destroys respect and understanding among communitites throughout the nation.

Coulter is a popular right-wing icon who received her law degree from the University of Michigan and founded the university's chapter of the conservative Federalist Society. A staunch anti-affirmative-action foe, Coulter worked for the Center for Individual Rights, which litigated the 2003 University of Michigan anti-affirmative-action cases.

Coulter's first national media appearance came after she was hired in 1996 by MSNBC as a legal correspondent. According to Time magazine, the network dismissed her at least twice—first in February 1997, after she insulted the late Pamela Harriman, the U.S. Ambassador to France, as the network was covering her memorial service.

Coulter contracted with USA Today to cover the 2004 Democratic National Convention. She wrote one article that began "Here at the Spawn of Satan convention in Boston" and referred to some unspecified female attendees as "corn-fed, no make-up, natural fiber, no-bra needing, sandal-wearing, hirsute, somewhat fragrant hippie chick pie wagons." The newspaper declined to print the article citing an editing dispute over "basic weaknesses in clarity and readability that we found unacceptable."

Coulter proclaims Christian religious beliefs. At one public lecture, she proclaimed her faith in Jesus Christ, saying: "I don't care about anything else: Christ died for my sins and nothing else matters."

Well, whatever happened to "Love thy neighbor?"

I hope she's done herself in this time. I'm sick of the lowest common denominator taking center stage.

0 Comments:

Post a Comment

<< Home

Disgraceful!

I just find it unfathomable that in 2007, a hack network like Fox News can get away with this. I couldn't listen to two seconds of Sean Hannity. Here's another attempt to smear. They couldn't make the Muslim madrasas story stick so now they are trying to claim that Obama belongs to a black, separatist cult.

COLMES: You don't even know what they do there. You're basing this on a web site that you've read. Never having actually been at the actual church or ever having asked Barack Obama something about his faith, something which he's talked about quite extensively. (transcript below the fold)
Mr. Rush, it's Alan Colmes. I have a question. Are you questioning Barack Obama's Christianity?

RUSH: Yes.

COLMES: Who are you to do that?

RUSH: Anyone just the same as anyone else who can make a discernment about someone's faith.

COLMES: What right do you have to question somebody else's faith?

RUSH: I'm not questioning — well…

COLMES: OK, I did say — I did said.

RUSH: I did say I was questioning it. I'm questioning it because if when I visited his web site, I saw more references to politics, Afrocentrism.

COLMES: Not his web site. It's his church's web site. It's his church, the church's web site, not Barack Obama's web site.

RUSH: Well, that's his faith.

COLMES: Is he responsible for that web site?

RUSH: Is he responsible for the web site? No. But he's a member of the church.

COLMES: Have you ever been to that church?

RUSH: No, I've never been to that church.

COLMES: Do you think you might be more acquainted with what to do if you actually went there first?

RUSH: More acquainted? Possibly, possibly not. Look, he can worship in a coven if he wants to.

COLMES: He's not worshipping in a coven. It's a Christian church.

RUSH: My point is that he — that their doctrine is divisive, and if he's going to be a member of an African separatist sort of a movement, that pledges allegiance.

COLMES: Are you suggesting Barack Obama is an African separatist?

RUSH: If he's not, he's missing out on a darn good chance to be one is what I'm saying.

COLMES: Is he one or isn't he? Is that your accusation?

RUSH: No. I'm not — I'm not accusing him of being a separatist.

COLMES: Then what's the point?

RUSH: Then what's the point? The point is that the doctrine waxes separatist.

COLMES: It's a Christian church. It's clear to Christian church. I think it's quite presumptuous and arrogant for anybody to question somebody else's faith. And you've never been to that church.

You don't even know what they do there. You're basing this on a web site that you've read. Never having actually been at the actual church or ever having asked Barack Obama something about his faith, something which he's talked about quite extensively.

RUSH: Their web site is representative of them. That's why it's out there. Their pastor puts writings on it which are representative of them. That's why it's out there.

I don't know where they got this kneegro to go on TV and spew this BS but, being from Chicago, I've been to Trinity United Church of Christ. Many of my friends are members. Oprah Winfrey was once a member. It's a typical black church, albeit it has many affluent members, and I cannot believe that anyone would stoop this low. It's just disgusting!

1 Comments:

At 6:28 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

I've quoted you on http://www.obamapedia.org/page/Obama+Myths

 

Post a Comment

<< Home

Baby Collector

So is she this generation's Josephine Baker? What's with the "one of these, one of those?" I hope these kids don't turn out wierd!:
"Angelina Jolie has filed papers to adopt a Vietnamese child, the country's top adoption official said Friday.

A U.S. adoption agency representing the 31-year-old actress filed the papers at Vietnam's International Adoption Agency, said Vu Duc Long, the agency's director.

'She just filed the papers this week,' Long said.

Jolie and her partner, Brad Pitt, have three children: 5-year-old son Maddox, adopted from Cambodia; 2-year-old daughter Zahara, adopted from Ethiopia; and another daughter, Shiloh, who was born to the couple in May.

Long would not name the U.S. adoption agency working with Jolie, who applied to adopt as a single parent.

Jolie and Pitt, 43, made a surprise visit to Vietnam at Thanksgiving, when they visited the Tam Binh orphanage, on the outskirts of Ho Chi Minh City.

Their pictures were splashed across the front page of Vietnamese newspapers, showing the couple cruising around Ho Chi Minh City on a motorbike.

Nguyen Van Trung, the director of the Tam Binh orphanage, declined to comment. He said he was awaiting the papers from the International Adoption Agency."

0 Comments:

Post a Comment

<< Home

Angry Chinese Man

Well, now that Asians seem to be getting all kinds of exposure on pop culture's latest reality shows, I guess they can line up with the angry white men and angry black men. What bug got into this guy's ass?

A San Francisco weekly newspaper that bills itself as "The Voice of Asian America" is facing harsh criticism from that very community for publishing a column Friday titled "Why I Hate Blacks."

In the column, AsianWeek regular contributor Kenneth Eng listed "reasons" to discriminate against African Americans. The piece has been pulled from the newspaper's Web site, but the print edition of the free paper, owned by the politically influential Fang family, was still available in news racks Monday.

Eng called himself an "Asian supremacist" in January in another installment of the column, which runs under the label "God of the Universe."

Prominent Asian Americans immediately condemned Eng's current column.

"The hate is based on ignorance and is very similar to the rationales that the KKK uses against African Americans," said Henry Der, director for 22 years of Chinese for Affirmative Action and the former state administrator for Emeryville's schools.

[...]
Eng's "reasons" for hating black people include:

-- "Blacks hate us. Every Asian who has ever come across them knows that they take almost every opportunity to hurl racist remarks at us."

-- "Contrary to media depictions, I would argue that blacks are weak-willed. They are the only race that has been enslaved for 300 years."

-- "Blacks are easy to coerce. This is proven by the fact that so many of them, including the Rev. Al Sharpton, tend to be Christians."

This is so bogus. The editor of this paper couldn't have read this and signed off on this story. It's pure rubbish and based on stereotypes and, obviously, no real research on or contact with black Americans.

I work in a place where the Chinese even out number the East Indians. I hear broken English or some Chinese dialect ALL DAY LONG! Unlike black folks, tables full of them folks can "sit together in the cafeteria" and no one dares go over and interrupt them speaking in their native tongue the way folks will go up to two black folks at the water fountain and say "what are you guys talking about?" I am in a high tech job at a company where most of the folks do not speak standard English. I have probably experienced more racism from immigrants who've only seen TV images of black people than I have from white folks ('cause they suddenly want to be American with me). But, I don't hate Asians and neither do any other black folks that I know.

I'm glad he's being dropped from the paper. What he really needs to do is bond with the other "angry" men in the country. They have far more in common with him than his average Asian counterpart.

Another thing: these folks need to understand who fought for their right to be here. They would not be outnumbering the white folks in Silicon Valley had it not been for the struggles of the "weak-willed" black folks who have endured and succeeded in here in spite of the fact that this is America not because this is America.

0 Comments:

Post a Comment

<< Home

It Wasn't A Mock Southern Accent, It Was A Mock Black Accent

These folks don't even need to go there. The one thing that really gets under my skin during election seasons is when most white candidates go to black churches and want to play Marting Luther King. Most of them suddenly change their speech pattern to try to connect with black audiences and plug into the call and response cultural idiosyncrasy. Bill Clinton did it. Al Gore did it. They all do it.

New York Senator Hillary Clinton felt so insecure about her trip to the American south this weekend that she dusted off hubby Bill Clinton and dragged the former president along for some very important support. While it seems fairly obvious that any Hillary strategy in a 2008 general election will write off the south, she seems quite concerned about Barack Obama and his recent surge.

Even though it is seriously early, Clinton's numbers with Democrat voters are falling and Obama is closing the gap. Newsbusters reports that Andrea Mitchell, while narrating the segment on the political duel between Obama and Hillary in Selma, Alabama this weekend portrayed Obama as having authentic appeal, while picturing Hillary resorting to heavy-handed political tactics.

Obama did the exact same thing. I heard him on NPR where he admitted that he is more relaxed and does change the way he addresses the audience. While many want to claim he is not really black, he's chosen a life and a wife that have embraced him and included him in the count. The bottom line is that I cannot believe people are calling Hillary on it when I cannot even go to work and not have some white person coming up to me and wanting to lapse into some "black slang" that they've never heard me speak. Hillary was trying to be down just like the rest of her counterparts.

0 Comments:

Post a Comment

<< Home

Thursday, March 01, 2007

Why They Hate Us ...

... because we are playing both sides of the middle! We are claiming people are evil yet sleeping with them on the downlow.
"To undermine Iran, which is predominantly Shiite, the Bush Administration has decided, in effect, to reconfigure its priorities in the Middle East. In Lebanon, the Administration has co�perated with Saudi Arabia’s government, which is Sunni, in clandestine operations that are intended to weaken Hezbollah, the Shiite organization that is backed by Iran. The U.S. has also taken part in clandestine operations aimed at Iran and its ally Syria. A by-product of these activities has been the bolstering of Sunni extremist groups that espouse a militant vision of Islam and are hostile to America and sympathetic to Al Qaeda.

One contradictory aspect of the new strategy is that, in Iraq, most of the insurgent violence directed at the American military has come from Sunni forces, and not from Shiites. But, from the Administration’s perspective, the most profound—and unintended—strategic consequence of the Iraq war is the empowerment of Iran. Its President, Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, has made defiant pronouncements about the destruction of Israel and his country’s right to pursue its nuclear program, and last week its supreme religious leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, said on state television that “realities in the region show that the arrogant front, headed by the U.S. and its allies, will be the principal loser in the region.”"

Wake up folks! The only axis of evil involves Bush, Cheney ... and their cronies in Israel.

0 Comments:

Post a Comment

<< Home